Re: [PATCH V6 4/4] x86/resctrl: Use appropriate API for strings terminated by newline

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 02:28:31PM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> The user input to files in the resctrl filesystem are expected to be
> terminated with a newline. Testing the user input includes a test for
> the presence of a newline and then replacing the newline with NUL
> byte followed by comparison using strcmp().
> 
> sysfs_streq() exists to test if strings are equal, treating both NUL and
> newline-then-NUL as equivalent string terminations. Even more,
> sysfs_match_string() exists to match a given string in an array using
> sysfs_streq().
> 
> Replace existing strcmp() comparisons of strings that are terminated
> with a newline with more appropriate sysfs_streq() via the
> sysfs_match_string() API that can perform the match across the different
> mode strings that are already maintained in an array.

FWIW,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

> Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
> ---
> Changes since V5:
> - Remove the early check of the sysfs_match_string() return code. (Andy)
> 
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 28 ++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> index 088a1536bccc..07e0f150c56e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> @@ -1414,13 +1414,11 @@ static ssize_t rdtgroup_mode_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>  				   char *buf, size_t nbytes, loff_t off)
>  {
>  	struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp;
> -	enum rdtgrp_mode mode;
>  	int ret = 0;
> +	int user_m;
>  
> -	/* Valid input requires a trailing newline */
> -	if (nbytes == 0 || buf[nbytes - 1] != '\n')
> +	if (nbytes == 0)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -	buf[nbytes - 1] = '\0';
>  
>  	rdtgrp = rdtgroup_kn_lock_live(of->kn);
>  	if (!rdtgrp) {
> @@ -1430,29 +1428,25 @@ static ssize_t rdtgroup_mode_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>  
>  	rdt_last_cmd_clear();
>  
> -	mode = rdtgrp->mode;
> +	user_m = sysfs_match_string(rdt_mode_str, buf);
>  
> -	if ((!strcmp(buf, "shareable") && mode == RDT_MODE_SHAREABLE) ||
> -	    (!strcmp(buf, "exclusive") && mode == RDT_MODE_EXCLUSIVE) ||
> -	    (!strcmp(buf, "pseudo-locksetup") &&
> -	     mode == RDT_MODE_PSEUDO_LOCKSETUP) ||
> -	    (!strcmp(buf, "pseudo-locked") && mode == RDT_MODE_PSEUDO_LOCKED))
> +	/* Do nothing and return success if user asks for current mode */
> +	if (user_m == rdtgrp->mode)
>  		goto out;
>  
> -	if (mode == RDT_MODE_PSEUDO_LOCKED) {
> +	if (rdtgrp->mode == RDT_MODE_PSEUDO_LOCKED) {
>  		rdt_last_cmd_puts("Cannot change pseudo-locked group\n");
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!strcmp(buf, "shareable")) {
> +	if (user_m == RDT_MODE_SHAREABLE) {
>  		if (rdtgrp->mode == RDT_MODE_PSEUDO_LOCKSETUP) {
>  			ret = rdtgroup_locksetup_exit(rdtgrp);
>  			if (ret)
>  				goto out;
>  		}
> -		rdtgrp->mode = RDT_MODE_SHAREABLE;
> -	} else if (!strcmp(buf, "exclusive")) {
> +	} else if (user_m == RDT_MODE_EXCLUSIVE) {
>  		if (!rdtgroup_mode_test_exclusive(rdtgrp)) {
>  			ret = -EINVAL;
>  			goto out;
> @@ -1462,16 +1456,16 @@ static ssize_t rdtgroup_mode_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>  			if (ret)
>  				goto out;
>  		}
> -		rdtgrp->mode = RDT_MODE_EXCLUSIVE;
> -	} else if (!strcmp(buf, "pseudo-locksetup")) {
> +	} else if (user_m == RDT_MODE_PSEUDO_LOCKSETUP) {
>  		ret = rdtgroup_locksetup_enter(rdtgrp);
>  		if (ret)
>  			goto out;
> -		rdtgrp->mode = RDT_MODE_PSEUDO_LOCKSETUP;
>  	} else {
>  		rdt_last_cmd_puts("Unknown or unsupported mode\n");
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
>  	}
> +	rdtgrp->mode = user_m;
>  
>  out:
>  	rdtgroup_kn_unlock(of->kn);
> -- 
> 2.21.0
> 

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko