From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D754BC433E0 for ; Thu, 28 May 2020 14:56:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F982084C for ; Thu, 28 May 2020 14:56:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2403889AbgE1O4r (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2020 10:56:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46262 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2403813AbgE1O4O (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2020 10:56:14 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87C3FC08C5C6 for ; Thu, 28 May 2020 07:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jeJx6-0002QG-PO; Thu, 28 May 2020 16:56:13 +0200 Received: from nanos.tec.linutronix.de (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD680FF834; Thu, 28 May 2020 16:56:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20200528145522.807135882@linutronix.de> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 16:53:17 +0200 From: Thomas Gleixner To: LKML Cc: x86@kernel.org Subject: [patch 2/5] x86/idt: Add comments about early #PF handling References: <20200528145315.727724091@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8-bit X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The difference between 32 and 64 bit vs. early #PF handling is not documented. Replace the FIXME at idt_setup_early_pf() with proper comments. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- arch/x86/kernel/idt.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/idt.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/idt.c @@ -61,7 +61,11 @@ static bool idt_setup_done __initdata; static const __initconst struct idt_data early_idts[] = { INTG(X86_TRAP_DB, asm_exc_debug), SYSG(X86_TRAP_BP, asm_exc_int3), + #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 + /* + * Not possible on 64-bit. See idt_setup_early_pf() for details. + */ INTG(X86_TRAP_PF, asm_exc_page_fault), #endif }; @@ -276,8 +280,10 @@ void __init idt_setup_traps(void) * cpu_init() is invoked and sets up TSS. The IST variant is installed * after that. * - * FIXME: Why is 32bit and 64bit installing the PF handler at different - * places in the early setup code? + * Note, that X86_64 cannot install the real #PF handler in + * idt_setup_early_traps() because the memory intialization needs the #PF + * handler from the early_idt_handler_array to initialize the early page + * tables. */ void __init idt_setup_early_pf(void) {