From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D025CC433E1 for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 18:58:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BD82074B for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 18:58:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="FVPKo3yG" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727888AbgE2S6a (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2020 14:58:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54354 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725865AbgE2S62 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2020 14:58:28 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x244.google.com (mail-lj1-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::244]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B48AC03E969; Fri, 29 May 2020 11:58:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x244.google.com with SMTP id e4so534177ljn.4; Fri, 29 May 2020 11:58:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Cu18taknHbe/FbD9yOGPOycvyvQ+EsO0Ye+2x5fPqno=; b=FVPKo3yGU/mqVlof1F0Z4UeYJc9h5xv7/3XxCkDtBAAKy6ndK3q+aMFXbt9ZgXKo+a RjWfLlgoHohemD0C+CcKo4DZF1SN+Hd87TNBq/Pzk5LACsVyZvjFmy7Z+0CE0/KSaRVd VtTEzv/an3wNcUdmNGjjT7Xr0whgTHsGns7eu9m7BN9ixJM5RTezvL5BlUsaToD2bivY koARdORhLmLdVBhjYa2TSPy4O94JBRajg0V+KiuubXrEl3zUK7GvYqfO9bSKl4E8mpJq NMdVIsio7ddwg1yhS73Rgt9gnRDG40Nr6o1/d8HodgZ8dHd86pIxeS4+5x7K9oxa48iM gLPA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Cu18taknHbe/FbD9yOGPOycvyvQ+EsO0Ye+2x5fPqno=; b=SDPgCHwIRpVOsLiDAvx3sETuZ7p6P6C3EgLbMjWLCyoynebZ9N3+TRqyVmcyiVYbc0 /kOeQWrWm7jGHA/vrHEBkiL1lcmA7peIYqj2YMT/BuOJhfBLOvRLwiVrBb24wa8ly9xX FQIrZzyWYLB2mE4FDmiNpwJvloMp25mS6ytxxktjePDIu45AIq2Fx0LS30+UuUOabgx0 bh1QVsuyHxZmhtOmQQrFeIHQO+xx77VjdCSj+9uS3GLVUSuU9k6kpJ7t/WwctjsEaGvB FQgzByaRVgDVRngwBxxWRJItSaW5bkAYUgC6lKPN9KqSqv9/Bdn84d9rFALUiDMiHwp4 0PfA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530E8wdQXzas+2vjgQ8R9dLYA8Rddy83Og1fiOf3Z9EgYFnIZkmE aSbRowZPKG+KxP3ptPJ99EM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwOPjYAcHWCc0NuNTt+necJgZaSRwtcOXXAuB93AaP9HMLV/49dJxDvmDNMLS9f08cR0TweJw== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8956:: with SMTP id b22mr5129992ljk.16.1590778706764; Fri, 29 May 2020 11:58:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mobilestation ([95.79.222.123]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q4sm2425667lfm.93.2020.05.29.11.58.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 29 May 2020 11:58:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 21:58:24 +0300 From: Serge Semin To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Serge Semin , Rob Herring , Jarkko Nikula , Wolfram Sang , Alexey Malahov , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Mika Westerberg , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] dt-bindings: i2c: Discard i2c-slave flag from the DW I2C example Message-ID: <20200529185824.o2vcpxe4f63aw465@mobilestation> References: <20200527153046.6172-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> <20200527153046.6172-3-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> <20200527153351.rmzguymz7lm6gvsx@mobilestation> <20200529181338.GA2676189@bogus> <20200529182256.3bp4uvvrvz3ddlrq@mobilestation> <20200529184201.GX1634618@smile.fi.intel.com> <20200529184534.wyyv5i7hcto5y3d3@mobilestation> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200529184534.wyyv5i7hcto5y3d3@mobilestation> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:45:37PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:42:01PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:22:56PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:13:38PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 06:33:51PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > > > > > > you're sending > > > > new versions too fast. Give people time to review. > > > > > > Yeah, you did. Sorry for sending the new versions very fast. Normally I prefer > > > to keep up with comments so to past a particular maintainer review as fast as > > > possible without long delays. In my experience the longer you wait, the lesser > > > maintainers remember about your patchset, the harder for one to continue the > > > next versions review. > > > > > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst: > > > > "Wait for a minimum of one week before resubmitting or pinging reviewers - > > possibly longer during busy times like merge windows." > > Good to know what I already know.) How much do you personally wait before > resubmitting? In my experience reviewing your DW APB GPIO patches, no longer > than a few hours. Moreover the statement you cited is about the patches, which doesn't get any attention from the maintainers/reviewers for quite some time. In this case I normally resubmit the patches no sooner than a week. I was talking about the situation when you get the review comments, which need to be addressed. -Sergey > > -Sergey > > > > > > > -- > > With Best Regards, > > Andy Shevchenko > > > >