From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me>,
Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>,
Jeffrey Vander Stoep <jeffv@google.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chris Palmer <palmer@google.com>,
Robert Sesek <rsesek@google.com>, Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>,
Matt Denton <mpdenton@google.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] seccomp: Introduce addfd ioctl to seccomp user notifier
Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 15:58:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200530135827.cxltfmiqara4yaki@wittgenstein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG48ez0+BvbLoSc+zcZwnwfOSCFt2LHnUkzzt-d4LQFJYXZC9w@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 05:17:24AM +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 4:43 AM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> > I mean, yes, that's certainly better, but it just seems a shame that
> > everyone has to do the get_unused/put_unused dance just because of how
> > SCM_RIGHTS does this weird put_user() in the middle.
> >
> > Can anyone clarify the expected failure mode from SCM_RIGHTS? Can we
> > move the put_user() after instead?
>
> Honestly, I think trying to remove file descriptors and such after
> -EFAULT is a waste of time. If userspace runs into -EFAULT, userspace
Agreed, we've never bothered with trying to recover from EFAULT. Just
look at kernel/fork.c:_do_fork():
if (clone_flags & CLONE_PARENT_SETTID)
put_user(nr, args->parent_tid);
we don't even bother even though we technically could.
> is beyond saving and can't really do much other than exit immediately.
> There are a bunch of places that will change state and then throw
> -EFAULT at the end if userspace supplied an invalid address, because
> trying to hold locks across userspace accesses just in case userspace
> supplied a bogus address is kinda silly (and often borderline
> impossible).
>
> You can actually see that even scm_detach_fds() currently just
> silently swallows errors if writing some header fields fails at the
> end.
There's really no point in trying to save a broken scm message imho.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-30 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-28 11:08 [PATCH v2 0/3] Add seccomp notifier ioctl that enables adding fds Sargun Dhillon
2020-05-28 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] seccomp: Add find_notification helper Sargun Dhillon
2020-05-29 6:23 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-29 17:40 ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-05-29 20:14 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-29 9:57 ` Christian Brauner
2020-05-28 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] seccomp: Introduce addfd ioctl to seccomp user notifier Sargun Dhillon
2020-05-29 7:31 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-29 7:38 ` Christian Brauner
2020-05-29 7:45 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-30 1:10 ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-05-30 2:43 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-30 3:17 ` Jann Horn
2020-05-30 5:22 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-30 13:58 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2020-05-30 16:09 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-30 3:58 ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-05-30 5:47 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-30 14:13 ` Christian Brauner
2020-05-30 16:14 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-30 16:21 ` Christian Brauner
2020-05-30 14:08 ` Al Viro
2020-05-30 16:07 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-01 19:02 ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-06-01 19:59 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-29 9:24 ` Giuseppe Scrivano
2020-05-29 10:32 ` Christian Brauner
2020-05-29 13:31 ` Christian Brauner
2020-05-29 22:35 ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-05-28 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] selftests/seccomp: Test SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD Sargun Dhillon
2020-05-29 7:41 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-29 13:29 ` Tycho Andersen
2020-05-29 18:46 ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-05-29 19:12 ` Tycho Andersen
2020-05-29 20:09 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-29 13:30 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Add seccomp notifier ioctl that enables adding fds Tycho Andersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200530135827.cxltfmiqara4yaki@wittgenstein \
--to=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jeffv@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpdenton@google.com \
--cc=palmer@google.com \
--cc=rsesek@google.com \
--cc=sargun@sargun.me \
--cc=tycho@tycho.ws \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).