linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] refperf: work around 64-bit division
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 13:03:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200531200317.GN2869@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a3UB2M7Wv8BZx3-ASbsvxD3KHbHCCQ_04xTLPwkEB6twQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 10:01:36AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 5:52 AM Nathan Chancellor
> <natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 10:15:51PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > >       strcat(buf, "Threads\tTime(ns)\n");
> > >
> > >       for (exp = 0; exp < nruns; exp++) {
> > > +             u64 avg;
> > > +             u32 rem;
> > > +
> > >               if (errexit)
> > >                       break;
> > > -             sprintf(buf1, "%d\t%llu.%03d\n", exp + 1, result_avg[exp] / 1000, (int)(result_avg[exp] % 1000));
> > > +
> > > +             avg = div_s64_rem(result_avg[exp], 1000, &rem);
> >
> > Shouldn't this be div_u64_rem? result_avg is u64.
> 
> Yes, you are right. Actually that would be an important optimization
> since div_u64_rem() optimizes for constant divisors while div_s64_rem
> uses the slow path.
> 
> > > +             sprintf(buf1, "%d\t%llu.%03d\n", exp + 1, avg, rem);
> >
> > Would %03u be the better specifier since rem is u32?
> 
> Yes, though this makes no difference in practice.
> 
> Paul, should I send a fixup for these two, or do you prefer to just
> edit it in place?

And here is the update, thank you all!

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

commit 0dd4132157c2cf6bec2a0a6e04163067323abdb1
Author: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date:   Fri May 29 14:36:26 2020 -0700

    refperf: Work around 64-bit division
    
    A 64-bit division was introduced in refperf, breaking compilation
    on all 32-bit architectures:
    
    kernel/rcu/refperf.o: in function `main_func':
    refperf.c:(.text+0x57c): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'
    
    Fix this by using div_u64 to mark the expensive operation.
    
    [ paulmck: Update primitive and format per Nathan Chancellor. ]
    Fixes: bd5b16d6c88d ("refperf: Allow decimal nanoseconds")
    Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
    Reported-by: Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>
    Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> # build-tested
    Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/refperf.c b/kernel/rcu/refperf.c
index 99434e7..3b72925 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/refperf.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/refperf.c
@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ static int main_func(void *arg)
 		if (torture_must_stop())
 			goto end;
 
-		result_avg[exp] = 1000 * process_durations(nreaders) / (nreaders * loops);
+		result_avg[exp] = div_u64(1000 * process_durations(nreaders), nreaders * loops);
 	}
 
 	// Print the average of all experiments
@@ -489,9 +489,13 @@ static int main_func(void *arg)
 	strcat(buf, "Runs\tTime(ns)\n");
 
 	for (exp = 0; exp < nruns; exp++) {
+		u64 avg;
+		u32 rem;
+
 		if (errexit)
 			break;
-		sprintf(buf1, "%d\t%llu.%03d\n", exp + 1, result_avg[exp] / 1000, (int)(result_avg[exp] % 1000));
+		avg = div_u64_rem(result_avg[exp], 1000, &rem);
+		sprintf(buf1, "%d\t%llu.%03u\n", exp + 1, avg, rem);
 		strcat(buf, buf1);
 	}
 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-31 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-29 20:15 [PATCH] refperf: work around 64-bit division Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-29 21:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-05-29 22:12 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-05-30  3:52 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-05-30  8:01   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-30 12:47     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-05-31 20:03     ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200531200317.GN2869@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72 \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).