linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: x86@kernel.org, elver@google.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, will@kernel.org, dvyukov@google.com,
	glider@google.com, andreyknvl@google.com,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/8] kasan: Bump required compiler version
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 12:22:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200604102428.135635542@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20200604102241.466509982@infradead.org

From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>

Adds config variable CC_HAS_WORKING_NOSANITIZE_ADDRESS, which will be
true if we have a compiler that does not fail builds due to
no_sanitize_address functions. This does not yet mean they work as
intended, but for automated build-tests, this is the minimum
requirement.

For example, we require that __always_inline functions used from
no_sanitize_address functions do not generate instrumentation. On GCC <=
7 this fails to build entirely, therefore we make the minimum version
GCC 8.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Acked-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200602175859.GC2604@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
---
Apply after:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200602173103.931412766@infradead.org

v2:
* No longer restrict UBSAN (and KCSAN), since the attributes behave
  differently for different sanitizers. For UBSAN the above case with GCC
  <= 7 actually works fine (no compiler error). So it seems that only
  KASAN is affected by this -- let's limit our restriction to KASAN.
---
 lib/Kconfig.kasan |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

--- a/lib/Kconfig.kasan
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.kasan
@@ -15,11 +15,15 @@ config CC_HAS_KASAN_GENERIC
 config CC_HAS_KASAN_SW_TAGS
 	def_bool $(cc-option, -fsanitize=kernel-hwaddress)
 
+config CC_HAS_WORKING_NOSANITIZE_ADDRESS
+	def_bool !CC_IS_GCC || GCC_VERSION >= 80000
+
 config KASAN
 	bool "KASAN: runtime memory debugger"
 	depends on (HAVE_ARCH_KASAN && CC_HAS_KASAN_GENERIC) || \
 		   (HAVE_ARCH_KASAN_SW_TAGS && CC_HAS_KASAN_SW_TAGS)
 	depends on (SLUB && SYSFS) || (SLAB && !DEBUG_SLAB)
+	depends on CC_HAS_WORKING_NOSANITIZE_ADDRESS
 	help
 	  Enables KASAN (KernelAddressSANitizer) - runtime memory debugger,
 	  designed to find out-of-bounds accesses and use-after-free bugs.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-04 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-04 10:22 [PATCH 0/8] x86/entry: KCSAN/KASAN/UBSAN vs noinstr Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-04 10:22 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86, kcsan: Remove __no_kcsan_or_inline usage Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-04 10:22 ` [PATCH 2/8] kcsan: Remove __no_kcsan_or_inline Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-04 10:22 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86, kcsan: Add __no_kcsan to noinstr Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-04 10:22 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-06-04 10:22 ` [PATCH 5/8] compiler_types.h: Add __no_sanitize_{address,undefined} " Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-04 10:22 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86/entry, cpumask: Provide non-instrumented variant of cpu_is_offline() Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-04 10:22 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86/entry, ubsan, objtool: Whitelist __ubsan_handle_*() Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-04 10:22 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86/entry, bug: Comment the instrumentation_begin() usage for WARN() Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-04 11:01 ` [PATCH 0/8] x86/entry: KCSAN/KASAN/UBSAN vs noinstr Marco Elver
2020-06-15 10:07   ` Marco Elver
2020-06-15 14:57     ` Qian Cai
2020-06-15 15:06       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200604102428.135635542@infradead.org \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).