Hi David, On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 20:30:34 -0600 David Ahern wrote: > > On 6/1/20 5:20 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > > > On Mon, 11 May 2020 13:00:15 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> > >> Today's linux-next merge of the ipsec-next tree got conflicts in: > >> > >> net/ipv4/xfrm4_output.c > >> net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c > >> > >> between commit: > >> > >> 0c922a4850eb ("xfrm: Always set XFRM_TRANSFORMED in xfrm{4,6}_output_finish") > >> > >> from Linus' tree and commit: > >> > >> 2ab6096db2f1 ("xfrm: remove output_finish indirection from xfrm_state_afinfo") > >> > >> from the ipsec-next tree. > >> > >> I fixed it up (I used the latter versions of these files and then added > >> the following patch) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed > >> as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should > >> be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for > >> merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer > >> of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. > >> > >> From: Stephen Rothwell > >> Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 12:57:24 +1000 > >> Subject: [PATCH] xfrm: merge fixup for "remove output_finish indirection from xfrm_state_afinfo" > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell > >> --- > >> net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c | 4 ---- > >> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c > >> index 886a9b284b3a..0f4b3a5e02ba 100644 > >> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c > >> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c > >> @@ -574,16 +574,12 @@ int xfrm_output(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) > >> switch (x->outer_mode.family) { > >> case AF_INET: > >> memset(IPCB(skb), 0, sizeof(*IPCB(skb))); > >> -#ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER > >> IPCB(skb)->flags |= IPSKB_XFRM_TRANSFORMED; > >> -#endif > >> break; > >> case AF_INET6: > >> memset(IP6CB(skb), 0, sizeof(*IP6CB(skb))); > >> > >> -#ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER > >> IP6CB(skb)->flags |= IP6SKB_XFRM_TRANSFORMED; > >> -#endif > >> break; > >> } > >> > > > > It looks like this merge resolution fix up was missed when the > > ipsec-next tree was merged into the net-next tree. > > > > Thanks for catching that, Stephen. Important fix in 0c922a4850eb. > And now the net-next tree has been merged into Linus' tree without this fix :-( -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell