From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEBFFC433E0 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 23:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD52C2075B for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 23:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726090AbgFDXmf (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2020 19:42:35 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:56532 "EHLO mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725863AbgFDXme (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2020 19:42:34 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 054NXePP136940; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 19:41:55 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 31f9d6sxp0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 04 Jun 2020 19:41:55 -0400 Received: from m0127361.ppops.net (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 054NXekB136951; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 19:41:55 -0400 Received: from ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (62.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 31f9d6sxnp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 04 Jun 2020 19:41:55 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 054Nek6f028565; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 23:41:53 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 31bf482x7j-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 04 Jun 2020 23:41:53 +0000 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 054Nfo5P57409602 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 4 Jun 2020 23:41:50 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F02752050; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 23:41:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vajain21-in-ibm-com (unknown [9.85.71.124]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D28895204E; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 23:41:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: by vajain21-in-ibm-com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 05 Jun 2020 05:11:44 +0530 From: Vaibhav Jain To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Vaibhav Jain , Dan Williams , "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , Michael Ellerman , "Oliver O'Halloran" , Santosh Sivaraj , Steven Rostedt , Ira Weiny Subject: [PATCH v10 1/6] powerpc: Document details on H_SCM_HEALTH hcall Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 05:11:31 +0530 Message-Id: <20200604234136.253703-2-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: <20200604234136.253703-1-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com> References: <20200604234136.253703-1-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216,18.0.687 definitions=2020-06-04_13:2020-06-04,2020-06-04 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2006040160 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Add documentation to 'papr_hcalls.rst' describing the bitmap flags that are returned from H_SCM_HEALTH hcall as per the PAPR-SCM specification. Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Ira Weiny Acked-by: Ira Weiny Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain --- Changelog: v9..v10: * Added ack from Ira. Resend: * None v8..v9: * s/SCM/PMEM device. [ Dan Williams, Aneesh ] v7..v8: * Added a clarification on bit-ordering of Health Bitmap Resend: * None v6..v7: * None v5..v6: * New patch in the series --- Documentation/powerpc/papr_hcalls.rst | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/powerpc/papr_hcalls.rst b/Documentation/powerpc/papr_hcalls.rst index 3493631a60f8..48fcf1255a33 100644 --- a/Documentation/powerpc/papr_hcalls.rst +++ b/Documentation/powerpc/papr_hcalls.rst @@ -220,13 +220,51 @@ from the LPAR memory. **H_SCM_HEALTH** | Input: drcIndex -| Out: *health-bitmap, health-bit-valid-bitmap* +| Out: *health-bitmap (r4), health-bit-valid-bitmap (r5)* | Return Value: *H_Success, H_Parameter, H_Hardware* Given a DRC Index return the info on predictive failure and overall health of -the NVDIMM. The asserted bits in the health-bitmap indicate a single predictive -failure and health-bit-valid-bitmap indicate which bits in health-bitmap are -valid. +the PMEM device. The asserted bits in the health-bitmap indicate one or more states +(described in table below) of the PMEM device and health-bit-valid-bitmap indicate +which bits in health-bitmap are valid. The bits are reported in +reverse bit ordering for example a value of 0xC400000000000000 +indicates bits 0, 1, and 5 are valid. + +Health Bitmap Flags: + ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +| Bit | Definition | ++======+=======================================================================+ +| 00 | PMEM device is unable to persist memory contents. | +| | If the system is powered down, nothing will be saved. | ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +| 01 | PMEM device failed to persist memory contents. Either contents were | +| | not saved successfully on power down or were not restored properly on | +| | power up. | ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +| 02 | PMEM device contents are persisted from previous IPL. The data from | +| | the last boot were successfully restored. | ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +| 03 | PMEM device contents are not persisted from previous IPL. There was no| +| | data to restore from the last boot. | ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +| 04 | PMEM device memory life remaining is critically low | ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +| 05 | PMEM device will be garded off next IPL due to failure | ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +| 06 | PMEM device contents cannot persist due to current platform health | +| | status. A hardware failure may prevent data from being saved or | +| | restored. | ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +| 07 | PMEM device is unable to persist memory contents in certain conditions| ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +| 08 | PMEM device is encrypted | ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +| 09 | PMEM device has successfully completed a requested erase or secure | +| | erase procedure. | ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +|10:63 | Reserved / Unused | ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ **H_SCM_PERFORMANCE_STATS** -- 2.26.2