From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7487EC433E0 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 08:16:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51C7F206DC for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 08:16:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726242AbgFEIQr (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2020 04:16:47 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:53524 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726072AbgFEIQr (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2020 04:16:47 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96884AD18; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 08:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 10:16:44 +0200 From: Joerg Roedel To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andrew Morton , Mike Rapoport , Guenter Roeck , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: track which page-table levels were modified Message-ID: <20200605081644.GS6857@suse.de> References: <20200603232311.GA205619@roeck-us.net> <20200604083512.GN6857@suse.de> <20200604140617.e340dd507ee68b0a05bd21cb@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 02:12:14PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > That said, the commentary about "why is p.._alloc_track() in such a > core header file, when it's only used by two special cases" is > probably still true regardless of the 5-level fixup header.. I assume > Mike didn't do those kinds of changes? I'll try to move them to a separate header next week. The compile testing I set up for this patch-set will certainly be helpful for that :) Joerg