From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5998C433DF for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891D42053B for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727769AbgFENuR (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2020 09:50:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44240 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726981AbgFENuR (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2020 09:50:17 -0400 Received: from ZenIV.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2002:c35c:fd02::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0C32C08C5C2; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 06:50:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.93 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jhCjT-003agQ-4G; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 13:50:03 +0000 Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 14:50:03 +0100 From: Al Viro To: David Howells Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Konstantin Khlebnikov , linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] afs: Improvements for v5.8 Message-ID: <20200605135003.GH23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <2240660.1591289899@warthog.procyon.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2240660.1591289899@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 05:58:19PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > Hi Linus, > > Is it too late to put in a pull request for AFS changes? Apologies - I was > holding off and hoping that I could get Al to review the changes I made to > the core VFS change commit (first in the series) in response to his earlier > review comments. I have an ack for the Ext4 changes made, though. If you > would prefer it to be held off at this point, fair enough. > > Note that the series also got rebased to -rc7 to remove the dependency on > fix patches that got merged through the net tree. FWIW, I can live with fs/inode.c part in its current form