From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE1EC433DF for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 16:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB6820835 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 16:30:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591979415; bh=4LlTrbnAzIZFR6wHuayLVFm49WeLNfWz+dPx3QjZKGE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=PEw2F5Qp8ArKdT4MX5lOJwve9tglhGw9SxE01AAt+i9GfHWRlIzgLj9M3OEOMRVh4 soqF2mkhLcAKNluAdKEX4bOTeY2p2PFd+OL1qxPChko0lE5pm5FIopGJB4pLiGyK9O IkGjHvh+GhfvgtNu9GSqrtaveGIbMit9nQHsMC8M= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726302AbgFLQaO (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2020 12:30:14 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56744 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726085AbgFLQaN (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2020 12:30:13 -0400 Received: from localhost (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3802207ED; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 16:30:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591979413; bh=4LlTrbnAzIZFR6wHuayLVFm49WeLNfWz+dPx3QjZKGE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Y0hq5uQLQbmGvIYSOXCy/asfYb3eBKTjQLU4Y6u76hjB69bblP6aJqrUF12KvLU9k Kd/+Rm8om3D8SXw8qJU0MQLi60Gp9Dp68ggohmcSGDShQmmmFezvzUQqvbe04WKTJG 9IzmQh40CeIGEx/CjsZD5Ba9lFtXE5wCBPKEcj84= Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:30:09 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Dan Murphy Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, robh@kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ASoC: tas2562: Update shutdown GPIO property Message-ID: <20200612163009.GN5396@sirena.org.uk> References: <20200612160603.2456-1-dmurphy@ti.com> <20200612160603.2456-2-dmurphy@ti.com> <20200612160922.GL5396@sirena.org.uk> <0e482167-71c2-a128-b8b4-a054557d30e9@ti.com> <20200612162200.GM5396@sirena.org.uk> <432c41fe-8afa-2ccb-8917-fd64f4895144@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="v541l457l4DThMFo" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <432c41fe-8afa-2ccb-8917-fd64f4895144@ti.com> X-Cookie: As seen on TV. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --v541l457l4DThMFo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:27:04AM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote: > Well should we then just revert back to the non-standard name and just fix > up the code? > Or should we support both properties? Either option is fine for me, supporting both is a little nicer. --v541l457l4DThMFo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl7jrZEACgkQJNaLcl1U h9Bs4gf/YK7aSgRQxpt8N+GOcjobdxj76wwkgcRjsIHbJr8OYMe1r0Rgo3zU+IQ4 JirWgd4e4e5JP2JyZv1g856echYxneyYRwShozq+U/mtpu6VSPa11xF+wTRh+6hl s7FTPn1EAEDEPyo91CHy5Abgx37H0BYbJg2sEdVnyvYogFaRmlGGfeBvvNnyP2Cw 8FSxlIziTxNGz8e7x5VK9nC3xGtG/Cuc1MjDfdjVcDi9/pKmPok6G0DeY5R7/pfJ KcwJUOToL+QsPcbZYM3sCyDyWIcgvYX2Zn81yaCepoe8441HR+0awU17Y+etOB2e cvCErmPpmmhnjbsnYZhI5QC+vlZp5Q== =qJK+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --v541l457l4DThMFo--