linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	frederic@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] sched: TTWU, IPI, and assorted stuff
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 09:23:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200615162330.GF2723@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200615125654.678940605@infradead.org>

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 02:56:54PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> So Paul reported rcutorture hitting a NULL dereference, and patch #1 fixes it.
> 
> Now, patch #1 is obviously correct, but I can't explain how exactly it leads to
> the observed NULL pointer dereference. The NULL pointer deref happens in
> find_matching_se()'s last while() loop when is_same_group() fails even though
> both parents are NULL.

My bisection of yet another bug sometimes hits the scheduler NULL pointer
dereference on older commits.  I will try out patch #2.

Whether this is reassuring or depressing, I have no idea.  :-/

> The only explanation I have for that is that we just did an activate_task()
> while: 'task_cpu(p) != cpu_of(rq)', because then 'p->se.cfs_rq' doesn't match.
> However, I can't see how the lack of #1 would lead to that. Never-the-less,
> patch #2 adds assertions to warn us of this case.
> 
> Patch #3 is a trivial rename that ought to eradicate some confusion.
> 
> The last 3 patches is what I ended up with for cleaning up the whole
> smp_call_function/irq_work/ttwu thing more.

Would it be possible to allow a target CPU # on those instances of
__call_single_data?  This is extremely helpful for debugging lost
smp_call_function*() calls.

						Thanx, Paul

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-15 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-15 12:56 [PATCH 0/6] sched: TTWU, IPI, and assorted stuff Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-15 12:56 ` [PATCH 1/6] sched: Fix ttwu_queue_cond() Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-15 13:34   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-15 16:45     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-15 22:58       ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-22  9:11   ` Mel Gorman
2020-06-22  9:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-15 12:56 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched: Verify some SMP assumptions Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-15 12:56 ` [PATCH 3/6] sched: s/WF_ON_RQ/WQ_ON_CPU/ Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-22  9:13   ` Mel Gorman
2020-06-15 12:56 ` [PATCH 4/6] smp, irq_work: Continue smp_call_function*() and irq_work*() integration Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-15 12:56 ` [PATCH 5/6] irq_work: Cleanup Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-16 15:16   ` Petr Mladek
2020-06-15 12:57 ` [PATCH 6/6] smp: Cleanup smp_call_function*() Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-15 14:34   ` Jens Axboe
2020-06-15 16:04   ` Daniel Thompson
2020-06-17  8:23   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-17  9:00     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-17 11:04     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-18  6:51       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-18 16:25         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-15 16:23 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2020-06-15 16:40   ` [PATCH 0/6] sched: TTWU, IPI, and assorted stuff Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-15 17:21     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-15 19:11       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-15 19:55         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-16 16:31           ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-16 17:04         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-16 17:17           ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-16 17:53             ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-19 13:44             ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-19 17:20               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-19 17:48                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-19 18:11                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-19 18:46                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-20 18:46               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-16 17:51           ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200615162330.GF2723@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72 \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).