linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] of_graph: add of_graph_get_local_port()
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 04:25:13 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200616012513.GF1629@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200616012111.GE1629@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>

On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 04:21:12AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
> Thank you for the patch.
> 
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 08:22:29PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > In some case, like a DRM display code for example, it's useful to silently
> > check whether port node exists at all in a device-tree before proceeding
> > with parsing the graph.
> > 
> > This patch adds of_graph_get_local_port() which returns pointer to a local
> > port node, or NULL if graph isn't specified in a device-tree for a given
> > device node.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/of/property.c    | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >  include/linux/of_graph.h |  7 +++++++
> >  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> > index 1f2086f4e7ce..05c5f619b8bb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> > @@ -608,15 +608,7 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct device_node *parent,
> >  	 * parent port node.
> >  	 */
> >  	if (!prev) {
> > -		struct device_node *node;
> > -
> > -		node = of_get_child_by_name(parent, "ports");
> > -		if (node)
> > -			parent = node;
> > -
> > -		port = of_get_child_by_name(parent, "port");
> > -		of_node_put(node);
> > -
> > +		port = of_graph_get_local_port(parent);
> >  		if (!port) {
> >  			pr_err("graph: no port node found in %pOF\n", parent);
> >  			return NULL;
> > @@ -765,6 +757,28 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_remote_port(const struct device_node *node)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_graph_get_remote_port);
> >  
> > +/**
> > + * of_graph_get_local_port() - get local port node
> > + * @node: pointer to a local endpoint device_node
> > + *
> > + * Return: First local port node associated with local endpoint node linked
> > + *	   to @node. Use of_node_put() on it when done.
> > + */
> > +struct device_node *of_graph_get_local_port(const struct device_node *node)

I forgot to mention that, given that there could be multiple 'port'
nodes, this function would be better named
of_graph_get_first_local_port(). 'first' here would refer to the nodes
order in the device tree, which I believe may not match the port number.
For instance, in the following case

	ports {
		#address-cells = <1>;
		#size-cells = <1>;
		port@1 {
			reg = <1>;
		};
		port@0 {
			reg = <0>;
		};
	};

the function would I believe return port@1. It may be a good idea to
explain this in the documentation. Depending on how you use this
function, if your only use case is to test for the presence of port
nodes, it may be best to return a bool and name it of_graph_has_port()
or something similar.

> > +{
> > +	struct device_node *ports, *port;
> > +
> > +	ports = of_get_child_by_name(node, "ports");
> > +	if (ports)
> > +		node = ports;
> > +
> > +	port = of_get_child_by_name(node, "port");
> > +	of_node_put(ports);
> > +
> > +	return port;
> 
> The implementation doesn't seem to match the documentation. If node is a
> pointer to an endpoint, it should not have any ports child.
> 
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_graph_get_local_port);
> > +
> >  int of_graph_get_endpoint_count(const struct device_node *np)
> >  {
> >  	struct device_node *endpoint;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/of_graph.h b/include/linux/of_graph.h
> > index 01038a6aade0..1fdeb72c7765 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/of_graph.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/of_graph.h
> > @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(
> >  struct device_node *of_graph_get_remote_port(const struct device_node *node);
> >  struct device_node *of_graph_get_remote_node(const struct device_node *node,
> >  					     u32 port, u32 endpoint);
> > +struct device_node *of_graph_get_local_port(const struct device_node *node);
> >  #else
> >  
> >  static inline int of_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct device_node *node,
> > @@ -116,6 +117,12 @@ static inline struct device_node *of_graph_get_remote_node(
> >  	return NULL;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline struct device_node *of_graph_get_local_port(
> > +					const struct device_node *node)
> > +{
> > +	return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_OF */
> >  
> >  #endif /* __LINUX_OF_GRAPH_H */

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-16  1:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-14 17:22 [PATCH v7 0/6] Support DRM bridges on NVIDIA Tegra Dmitry Osipenko
2020-06-14 17:22 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] of_graph: add of_graph_get_local_port() Dmitry Osipenko
2020-06-16  1:21   ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-06-16  1:25     ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2020-06-16 13:56       ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-06-16 14:14         ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-06-14 17:22 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] drm/of: Make drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge() to check graph's presence Dmitry Osipenko
2020-06-16  1:26   ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-06-16 14:42     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-06-14 17:22 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] drm/tegra: output: Don't leak OF node on error Dmitry Osipenko
2020-06-14 17:22 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] drm/tegra: output: Support DRM bridges Dmitry Osipenko
2020-06-14 17:22 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] drm/tegra: output: rgb: Support LVDS encoder bridge Dmitry Osipenko
2020-06-14 17:22 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] drm/tegra: output: rgb: Wrap directly-connected panel into DRM bridge Dmitry Osipenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200616012513.GF1629@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=digetx@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).