From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB11C433E1 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:35:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620D320644 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:35:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="ZkENWgVQ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728984AbgFPOf0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2020 10:35:26 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:40202 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726526AbgFPOfZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2020 10:35:25 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f0f4c00b15c06cc69c9587d.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0f:4c00:b15c:6cc:69c9:587d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id B2F611EC0289; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 16:35:23 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1592318123; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=EcoBlamw+xTPMLRvT+GpzdkCpC6DAYKigFf4Z2daiJY=; b=ZkENWgVQ1RIyBGyzqnYB1OVikjSQAJjJD6hneI8RWOab3aW73TuqicbzCStRRaf8g023Fu 9QG3UIPXBF103ec5vb/SPcvGXB63twhaUiSPDNNIRoFVTvbTWH2+Ykqsp4+wqx7WR4Cb3M Y5j59ENZ+cYDWnoIloXbzCEB1M56ayc= Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 16:35:17 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Jacky Hu , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, x86@kernel.org, Yazen Ghannam , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] MCA and EDAC updates for AMD Family 17h, Model 60h Message-ID: <20200616143517.GH13515@zn.tnic> References: <20200607043709.48178-1-hengqing.hu@gmail.com> <20200615115950.GG14668@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 08:01:22AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Looks like we may have to black-list current measurements > for that chip, though. > > Guenter > > >> Jacky Hu (2): > >> x86/amd_nb: Add Family 17h, Model 60h PCI IDs > >> EDAC/amd64: Add family ops for Family 17h Models 60h-6Fh > >> > >> arch/x86/kernel/amd_nb.c | 5 +++++ > >> drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > >> drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h | 3 +++ > >> drivers/hwmon/k10temp.c | 2 ++ ... meaning I should not take the k10temp changes yet? I can drop them and take the rest... Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette