From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF00AC433DF for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 14:44:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8672421707 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 14:44:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1592577858; bh=L3YK4HhwSLCxtVLyXo4PKwaZSioEb4283EpfEjbdwFs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=IgH8h+qcBruO+3qrIHQZ1xSlQOIVmNa5v3aTJVqNpWKwlfWZ5DF0KZi8Vbid9eOfu s/h3d8QKGONNxGJy2ZPKd+nmQpJU7KhZbeIvgALP6Ivf37MH4kkcgmd6BCKLaqoBjr erFp24qbzlbjIyeeRRZ0H0bXVPvwvOtfIG7uet1w= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388547AbgFSOoQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jun 2020 10:44:16 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35068 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388511AbgFSOnx (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jun 2020 10:43:53 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2493221556; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 14:43:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1592577832; bh=L3YK4HhwSLCxtVLyXo4PKwaZSioEb4283EpfEjbdwFs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=xBoAoHQkc125SPDodIpYOd/OOJu0WbAECjoH4OuXgH2cQy/2OIrUkIsVUCwusg+RJ 0lL021LT+0mj7j14dJPmcbyCn/dzoNSkNb0kaTyFNdKTUKKHOTFBaSYfDP4M0zi5GB 40C9oAIiWaT3VcBZ1CZJTcVFq4g4a2DENN7hENh0= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Punit Agrawal , Alexander Duyck , Aaron Brown , Jeff Kirsher Subject: [PATCH 4.9 107/128] e1000e: Relax condition to trigger reset for ME workaround Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 16:33:21 +0200 Message-Id: <20200619141625.801951252@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20200619141620.148019466@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20200619141620.148019466@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Punit Agrawal commit d601afcae2febc49665008e9a79e701248d56c50 upstream. It's an error if the value of the RX/TX tail descriptor does not match what was written. The error condition is true regardless the duration of the interference from ME. But the driver only performs the reset if E1000_ICH_FWSM_PCIM2PCI_COUNT (2000) iterations of 50us delay have transpired. The extra condition can lead to inconsistency between the state of hardware as expected by the driver. Fix this by dropping the check for number of delay iterations. While at it, also make __ew32_prepare() static as it's not used anywhere else. CC: stable Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck Tested-by: Aaron Brown Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h | 1 - drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 12 +++++------- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h @@ -589,7 +589,6 @@ static inline u32 __er32(struct e1000_hw #define er32(reg) __er32(hw, E1000_##reg) -s32 __ew32_prepare(struct e1000_hw *hw); void __ew32(struct e1000_hw *hw, unsigned long reg, u32 val); #define ew32(reg, val) __ew32(hw, E1000_##reg, (val)) --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c @@ -136,14 +136,12 @@ static const struct e1000_reg_info e1000 * has bit 24 set while ME is accessing MAC CSR registers, wait if it is set * and try again a number of times. **/ -s32 __ew32_prepare(struct e1000_hw *hw) +static void __ew32_prepare(struct e1000_hw *hw) { s32 i = E1000_ICH_FWSM_PCIM2PCI_COUNT; while ((er32(FWSM) & E1000_ICH_FWSM_PCIM2PCI) && --i) udelay(50); - - return i; } void __ew32(struct e1000_hw *hw, unsigned long reg, u32 val) @@ -624,11 +622,11 @@ static void e1000e_update_rdt_wa(struct { struct e1000_adapter *adapter = rx_ring->adapter; struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw; - s32 ret_val = __ew32_prepare(hw); + __ew32_prepare(hw); writel(i, rx_ring->tail); - if (unlikely(!ret_val && (i != readl(rx_ring->tail)))) { + if (unlikely(i != readl(rx_ring->tail))) { u32 rctl = er32(RCTL); ew32(RCTL, rctl & ~E1000_RCTL_EN); @@ -641,11 +639,11 @@ static void e1000e_update_tdt_wa(struct { struct e1000_adapter *adapter = tx_ring->adapter; struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw; - s32 ret_val = __ew32_prepare(hw); + __ew32_prepare(hw); writel(i, tx_ring->tail); - if (unlikely(!ret_val && (i != readl(tx_ring->tail)))) { + if (unlikely(i != readl(tx_ring->tail))) { u32 tctl = er32(TCTL); ew32(TCTL, tctl & ~E1000_TCTL_EN);