From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB260C433E0 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:58:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C248920708 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:58:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725983AbgFVI6M (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 04:58:12 -0400 Received: from outbound-smtp32.blacknight.com ([81.17.249.64]:44972 "EHLO outbound-smtp32.blacknight.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725802AbgFVI6L (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 04:58:11 -0400 Received: from mail.blacknight.com (pemlinmail04.blacknight.ie [81.17.254.17]) by outbound-smtp32.blacknight.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D29F0BECB9 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:58:09 +0100 (IST) Received: (qmail 27448 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2020 08:58:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO techsingularity.net) (mgorman@techsingularity.net@[84.203.18.5]) by 81.17.254.9 with ESMTPSA (AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 22 Jun 2020 08:58:09 -0000 Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:58:08 +0100 From: Mel Gorman To: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Hugh Dickins , akpm@linux-foundation.org, alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, liwang@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm, page_alloc: use unlikely() in task_capc() Message-ID: <20200622085808.GP3183@techsingularity.net> References: <20200616082649.27173-1-vbabka@suse.cz> <20200616082649.27173-2-vbabka@suse.cz> <4a24f7af-3aa5-6e80-4ae6-8f253b562039@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4a24f7af-3aa5-6e80-4ae6-8f253b562039@suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:55:07AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > > It makes no difference, at least on my gcc10 which seems to be smart enough to > do the right thing. But yeah, your suggestion is more readable and precise and > maybe can work better with a less smart compiler. Thanks. > > ----8<---- > From 615eea6f6abe288ffb708aa0d1bdfbeaf30a4cbd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Vlastimil Babka > Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 10:14:47 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: use unlikely() in task_capc() > > Hugh noted that task_capc() could use unlikely(), as most of the time there is > no capture in progress and we are in page freeing hot path. Indeed adding > unlikely() produces assembly that better matches the assumption and moves > all the tests away from the hot path. > > I have also noticed that we don't need to test for cc->direct_compaction as the > only place we set current->task_capture is compact_zone_order() which also > always sets cc->direct_compaction true. > > Suggested-by: Hugh Dickins > Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka > Acked-by: Hugh Dickins Acked-by: Mel Gorman -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs