From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A74C433E0 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:15:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11DC92076E for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:15:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2404487AbgFXPO6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:14:58 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:44721 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2404271AbgFXPO6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:14:58 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 1839968B02; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:14:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:14:54 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jens Axboe Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Al Viro , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: move block bits out of fs.h Message-ID: <20200624151454.GB17344@lst.de> References: <20200620071644.463185-1-hch@lst.de> <20200624151211.GA17344@lst.de> <216bcea4-a38d-8a64-bc0f-be61b2f26e79@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <216bcea4-a38d-8a64-bc0f-be61b2f26e79@kernel.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 09:14:11AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 6/24/20 9:12 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 09:09:42AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > >> Applied for 5.9 - I kept this in a separate topic branch, fwiw. There's the > >> potential for some annoying issues with this, so would rather have it in > >> a branch we can modify easily, if we need to. > > > > Hmm, I have a bunch of things building on top of this pending, so that > > branch split will be interesting to handle. > > We can stuff it in for-5.9/block, but then I'd rather just rebase that > on 5.8-rc2 now since it's still early days. If we don't, we already > have conflicts... I'll happily rebase. rc1 also has funny ext4 warnings which are pretty annoying.