From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 04/13] perf stat: factor out body of event handling loop for system wide
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 19:13:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200625171300.GK2719003@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fdaba173-a046-beae-f8f2-07840c879475@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 07:01:08PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
SNIP
> >>
> >> Well, ok.
> >>
> >> I will rename process_interval() to __process_interval() and
> >> then print_interval() to process_interval().
> >>
> >> Regarding timeout let's have it like this:
> >>
> >> static bool process_timeout(int timeout)
> >> {
> >> return timeout ? true : false;
> >> }
> >
> > can't this just stay as value check after finished poll?
> >
> > if (timeout)
> > break;
> >
> > and then separate call to process_interval(interval, times)?
>
> Like this? Still makes sense to have it in a single function.
>
> static bool process_timing_settings(int timeout, unsigned int interval, int *times)
> {
> bool res = timeout ? true : false;
> if (!res)
> res = process_interval(interval, times);
> return res;
> }
I don't see the connection between timeout and interval
IMO this just complicates things, is there a problem to
keep it separated as it is now?
jirka
>
> ~Alexey
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-25 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-17 8:30 [PATCH v8 00/13] perf: support enable and disable commands in stat and record modes Alexey Budankov
2020-06-17 8:35 ` [PATCH v8 01/13] tools/libperf: avoid moving of fds at fdarray__filter() call Alexey Budankov
2020-06-24 17:19 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-25 17:14 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-25 19:32 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-26 9:37 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-26 10:06 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-29 15:11 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-29 19:17 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-17 8:35 ` [PATCH v8 02/13] perf evlist: introduce control file descriptors Alexey Budankov
2020-06-17 8:36 ` [PATCH v8 03/13] perf evlist: implement control command handling functions Alexey Budankov
2020-06-23 14:56 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-23 15:03 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-06-23 15:14 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-24 13:35 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-23 14:56 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-24 13:20 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-17 8:37 ` [PATCH v8 04/13] perf stat: factor out body of event handling loop for system wide Alexey Budankov
2020-06-23 14:56 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-24 14:27 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-25 12:17 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-25 16:01 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-25 17:13 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2020-06-25 18:43 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-17 8:38 ` [PATCH v8 05/13] perf stat: move target check to loop control statement Alexey Budankov
2020-06-17 8:39 ` [PATCH v8 06/13] perf stat: factor out body of event handling loop for fork case Alexey Budankov
2020-06-17 8:40 ` [PATCH v8 07/13] perf stat: factor out event handling loop into dispatch_events() Alexey Budankov
2020-06-23 14:56 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-24 13:27 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-17 8:40 ` [PATCH v8 08/13] perf stat: extend -D,--delay option with -1 value Alexey Budankov
2020-06-17 8:41 ` [PATCH v8 09/13] perf stat: implement control commands handling Alexey Budankov
2020-06-23 14:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-24 14:10 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-25 12:14 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-25 14:58 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-23 14:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-24 13:39 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-25 12:12 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-25 14:52 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-17 8:42 ` [PATCH v8 10/13] perf stat: introduce --control fd:ctl-fd[,ack-fd] options Alexey Budankov
2020-06-17 8:42 ` [PATCH v8 11/13] perf record: extend -D,--delay option with -1 value Alexey Budankov
2020-06-17 8:43 ` [PATCH v8 12/13] perf record: implement control commands handling Alexey Budankov
2020-06-23 14:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-24 14:00 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-24 14:55 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-25 17:07 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-17 8:44 ` [PATCH v8 13/13] perf record: introduce --control fd:ctl-fd[,ack-fd] options Alexey Budankov
2020-06-22 3:38 ` [PATCH v8 00/13] perf: support enable and disable commands in stat and record modes Alexey Budankov
2020-06-22 8:55 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200625171300.GK2719003@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).