From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 622BFC433E0 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 17:26:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4488420663 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 17:26:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727859AbgFZR0T (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jun 2020 13:26:19 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:7936 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725833AbgFZR0S (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jun 2020 13:26:18 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 05QH29pg046450; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 13:26:15 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 31wkbgbmy7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 26 Jun 2020 13:26:15 -0400 Received: from m0098409.ppops.net (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 05QH2D2L047419; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 13:26:15 -0400 Received: from ppma05fra.de.ibm.com (6c.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.108]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 31wkbgbmxc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 26 Jun 2020 13:26:15 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma05fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma05fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 05QHQDZt015720; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 17:26:13 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma05fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 31uusg1k4f-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 26 Jun 2020 17:26:12 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 05QHQA8k44630252 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 26 Jun 2020 17:26:10 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10BC611C050; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 17:26:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08FB11C04A; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 17:26:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from thinkpad (unknown [9.171.60.45]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with SMTP; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 17:26:09 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 19:26:08 +0200 From: Gerald Schaefer To: David Hildenbrand Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] s390x/vmem: get rid of memory segment list Message-ID: <20200626192608.354c43f6@thinkpad> In-Reply-To: <20200626192253.2281d95d@thinkpad> References: <20200625150029.45019-1-david@redhat.com> <20200626192253.2281d95d@thinkpad> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216,18.0.687 definitions=2020-06-26_08:2020-06-26,2020-06-26 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=743 impostorscore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2006260116 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 19:22:53 +0200 Gerald Schaefer wrote: [...] > > That should be OK, as it is also the same message that we already > see for overlaps with other DCSSs. But you probably also should > remove that case from the segment_warning() function for > completeness. ... and also from the comment of segment_load()