Did this get burried in along with a bunch of other patches? I am sending this email only because I did not recieve a negetive acknowledgement on the patch.

I apologize if this message was hurtful / disrespectfull in any manner,
thank you for reading this message.

karthik

On 20/06/28 12:38AM, B K Karthik wrote:
> Fixed a coding style issue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: B K Karthik <karthik.bk2000@live.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c
> index 90d125ba080f..c90730513438 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c
> @@ -495,11 +495,11 @@ static int ov2680_h_flip(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, s32 value)
>  	ret = ov2680_read_reg(client, 1, OV2680_MIRROR_REG, &val);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> -	if (value) {
> +	if (value)
>  		val |= OV2680_FLIP_MIRROR_BIT_ENABLE;
> -	} else {
> +	else
>  		val &= ~OV2680_FLIP_MIRROR_BIT_ENABLE;
> -	}
> +
>  	ret = ov2680_write_reg(client, 1,
>  			       OV2680_MIRROR_REG, val);
>  	if (ret)
> --
> 2.20.1