From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C52C433E0 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:22:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F075A20656 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:22:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1593462153; bh=J38Dy0/4rkAgW0VBoEWSxJgsCohC7R8TO4UdK0nob/0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=Sf2aD5kfVf223YxnVBaLU9IFa8kOCFD/V/mwNMp4pE+ci5AYuC+3y5Nn5IBbmSKyq pm99kKZsj8uCQIQR0P26JNXw1EinKdbY8BA7aGKTfoPa5rJ6/jEKeuvz2qmkNxq63d J23dyVPCdE0ZVEo3MyvJCYRxyu2xRup0u5Pg2JDE= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388818AbgF2UW3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:22:29 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:37070 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732583AbgF2TZd (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 15:25:33 -0400 Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F5C825371; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 15:40:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1593445237; bh=J38Dy0/4rkAgW0VBoEWSxJgsCohC7R8TO4UdK0nob/0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=BlGVUUgkHMlq0KhguAASSq0KVoV7FBKxo+sjeoRpmlmIbkBPKPIytvcWb2JnnNlVr /51JcAOorxIBHQxitgdjOZ7DtpdBK8CAuTyGt3p0aohefQP1KZJ51bJ+samjbBt3ee YY48pKQIs0RDAW/H9XEST0Q6S2gwa9alhi3bGU7A= From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Pingfan Liu , Hari Bathini , Michael Ellerman , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.9 021/191] powerpc/crashkernel: Take "mem=" option into account Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:37:17 -0400 Message-Id: <20200629154007.2495120-22-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20200629154007.2495120-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20200629154007.2495120-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-KernelTest-Patch: http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.229-rc1.gz X-KernelTest-Tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git X-KernelTest-Branch: linux-4.9.y X-KernelTest-Patches: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git X-KernelTest-Version: 4.9.229-rc1 X-KernelTest-Deadline: 2020-07-01T15:39+00:00 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Pingfan Liu [ Upstream commit be5470e0c285a68dc3afdea965032f5ddc8269d7 ] 'mem=" option is an easy way to put high pressure on memory during some test. Hence after applying the memory limit, instead of total mem, the actual usable memory should be considered when reserving mem for crashkernel. Otherwise the boot up may experience OOM issue. E.g. it would reserve 4G prior to the change and 512M afterward, if passing crashkernel="2G-4G:384M,4G-16G:512M,16G-64G:1G,64G-128G:2G,128G-:4G", and mem=5G on a 256G machine. This issue is powerpc specific because it puts higher priority on fadump and kdump reservation than on "mem=". Referring the following code: if (fadump_reserve_mem() == 0) reserve_crashkernel(); ... /* Ensure that total memory size is page-aligned. */ limit = ALIGN(memory_limit ?: memblock_phys_mem_size(), PAGE_SIZE); memblock_enforce_memory_limit(limit); While on other arches, the effect of "mem=" takes a higher priority and pass through memblock_phys_mem_size() before calling reserve_crashkernel(). Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu Reviewed-by: Hari Bathini Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1585749644-4148-1-git-send-email-kernelfans@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c index 9dafd7af39b8f..cb4d6cd949fc4 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c @@ -113,11 +113,12 @@ void machine_kexec(struct kimage *image) void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) { - unsigned long long crash_size, crash_base; + unsigned long long crash_size, crash_base, total_mem_sz; int ret; + total_mem_sz = memory_limit ? memory_limit : memblock_phys_mem_size(); /* use common parsing */ - ret = parse_crashkernel(boot_command_line, memblock_phys_mem_size(), + ret = parse_crashkernel(boot_command_line, total_mem_sz, &crash_size, &crash_base); if (ret == 0 && crash_size > 0) { crashk_res.start = crash_base; @@ -176,6 +177,7 @@ void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) /* Crash kernel trumps memory limit */ if (memory_limit && memory_limit <= crashk_res.end) { memory_limit = crashk_res.end + 1; + total_mem_sz = memory_limit; printk("Adjusted memory limit for crashkernel, now 0x%llx\n", memory_limit); } @@ -184,7 +186,7 @@ void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) "for crashkernel (System RAM: %ldMB)\n", (unsigned long)(crash_size >> 20), (unsigned long)(crashk_res.start >> 20), - (unsigned long)(memblock_phys_mem_size() >> 20)); + (unsigned long)(total_mem_sz >> 20)); if (!memblock_is_region_memory(crashk_res.start, crash_size) || memblock_reserve(crashk_res.start, crash_size)) { -- 2.25.1