From: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>
Cc: "axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"kbusch@kernel.org" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
Selvakumar S <selvakuma.s1@samsung.com>,
Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@samsung.com>,
Javier Gonzalez <javier.gonz@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: enable zone-append for iov_iter of bvec type
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 12:23:11 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200703065311.GB26058@test-zns> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR04MB37516E788EC8804D7DF9780EE76A0@CY4PR04MB3751.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3188 bytes --]
On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 05:32:56AM +0000, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>On 2020/07/03 0:42, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
>> zone-append with bvec iov_iter gives WARN_ON, and returns -EINVAL.
>> Add new helper to process such iov_iter and add pages in bio honoring
>> zone-append specific constraints.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Selvakumar S <selvakuma.s1@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Gonzalez <javier.gonz@samsung.com>
>> ---
>> block/bio.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
>> index 0cecdbc..ade9da7 100644
>> --- a/block/bio.c
>> +++ b/block/bio.c
>> @@ -975,6 +975,30 @@ static int __bio_iov_bvec_add_pages(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter)
>> iov_iter_advance(iter, size);
>> return 0;
>> }
>> +static int __bio_iov_bvec_append_add_pages(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter)
>> +{
>> + const struct bio_vec *bv = iter->bvec;
>> + unsigned int len;
>> + size_t size;
>> + struct request_queue *q = bio->bi_disk->queue;
>> + unsigned int max_append_sectors = queue_max_zone_append_sectors(q);
>> + bool same_page = false;
>> +
>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!max_append_sectors))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(iter->iov_offset > bv->bv_len))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + len = min_t(size_t, bv->bv_len - iter->iov_offset, iter->count);
>> + size = bio_add_hw_page(q, bio, bv->bv_page, len,
>> + bv->bv_offset + iter->iov_offset,
>> + max_append_sectors, &same_page);
>> + if (unlikely(size != len))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + iov_iter_advance(iter, size);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>>
>> #define PAGE_PTRS_PER_BVEC (sizeof(struct bio_vec) / sizeof(struct page *))
>>
>> @@ -1105,9 +1129,10 @@ int bio_iov_iter_get_pages(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter)
>>
>> do {
>> if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND) {
>> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(is_bvec))
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> - ret = __bio_iov_append_get_pages(bio, iter);
>> + if (is_bvec)
>> + ret = __bio_iov_bvec_append_add_pages(bio, iter);
>> + else
>> + ret = __bio_iov_append_get_pages(bio, iter);
>> } else {
>> if (is_bvec)
>> ret = __bio_iov_bvec_add_pages(bio, iter);
>>
>
>The only user of this function that issues zone append requests is zonefs. The
>issued requests are not using bvec iter but a user direct IO buffer iter. So
>this change would have no user at all as far as I can see. Am I missing
>something ? What IO path makes this change necessary ?
Yes, zonefs does not use bvec iter. But while enabling io-uring path for
zone-append, I hit into this condition returning -EINVAL.
Reference (from user zone-append series cover letter):
"Append using io_uring fixed-buffer --->
This is flagged as not-supported at the moment. Reason being, for fixed-buffer
io-uring sends iov_iter of bvec type. But current append-infra in block-layer
does not support such iov_iter."
And zone-append doesn't have a problem in using bvec iter as well, so
thought that this may make infra more complete/future-proof?
>--
>Damien Le Moal
>Western Digital Research
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-03 6:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20200702154204epcas5p15106774a3d556b77050710722da89922@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2020-07-02 15:38 ` [PATCH 0/2] fix/extend zone-append in block-layer Kanchan Joshi
[not found] ` <CGME20200702154208epcas5p39fe202f642a9d5c8dde9b911645c594c@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2020-07-02 15:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: fix error code for zone-append Kanchan Joshi
2020-07-03 5:29 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-07-03 6:20 ` Kanchan Joshi
[not found] ` <CGME20200702154213epcas5p4e8d42861cb5ae91ddeccf1ed73107304@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2020-07-02 15:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: enable zone-append for iov_iter of bvec type Kanchan Joshi
2020-07-03 5:32 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-07-03 6:53 ` Kanchan Joshi [this message]
2020-07-03 8:07 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-07-03 13:02 ` Johannes Thumshirn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200703065311.GB26058@test-zns \
--to=joshi.k@samsung.com \
--cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=javier.gonz@samsung.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nj.shetty@samsung.com \
--cc=selvakuma.s1@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).