From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
GregKroah-Hartmangregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
peterz@infradead.org
Subject: nr_cpu_ids vs AMD 3970x(32 physical CPUs)
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 17:57:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200703155749.GA6255@pc636> (raw)
Hello, folk.
I have a system based on AMD 3970x CPUs. It has 32 physical cores
and 64 threads. It seems that "nr_cpu_ids" variable is not correctly
set on latest 5.8-rc3 kernel. Please have a look below on dmesg output:
<snip>
urezki@pc638:~$ sudo dmesg | grep 128
[ 0.000000] IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 128, version 33, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-23
[ 0.000000] smpboot: Allowing 128 CPUs, 64 hotplug CPUs
[ 0.000000] setup_percpu: NR_CPUS:512 nr_cpumask_bits:512 nr_cpu_ids:128 nr_node_ids:1
...
[ 0.000000] SLUB: HWalign=64, Order=0-3, MinObjects=0, CPUs=128, Nodes=1
[ 0.000000] rcu: RCU restricting CPUs from NR_CPUS=512 to nr_cpu_ids=128.
[ 0.000000] rcu: Adjusting geometry for rcu_fanout_leaf=16, nr_cpu_ids=128
urezki@pc638:~$
<snip>
For example SLUB thinks that it deals with 128 CPUs in the system what is
wrong if i do not miss something. Since nr_cpu_ids is broken(?), thus the
"cpu_possible_mask" does not correspond to reality as well.
Any thoughts?
Thanks!
--
Vlad Rezki
next reply other threads:[~2020-07-03 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-03 15:57 Uladzislau Rezki [this message]
2020-07-03 16:56 ` nr_cpu_ids vs AMD 3970x(32 physical CPUs) Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-03 17:09 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-07-03 17:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-03 19:26 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-07-03 17:07 ` Gabriel C
2020-07-03 17:24 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-07-03 17:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-03 18:36 ` Gabriel C
2020-07-03 19:05 ` peter enderborg
2020-07-03 19:28 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-07-03 20:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-07-03 21:20 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-07-03 21:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-03 22:22 ` Uladzislau Rezki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200703155749.GA6255@pc636 \
--to=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=GregKroah-Hartmangregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).