From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6638C433DF for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:22:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9515A21531 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 12:22:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727109AbgGDMWZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Jul 2020 08:22:25 -0400 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz ([46.255.230.98]:44918 "EHLO jabberwock.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726667AbgGDMWY (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Jul 2020 08:22:24 -0400 Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 2ACD31C0BD2; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:22:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 14:22:22 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: =?utf-8?B?5a2Z5LiW6b6Z?= sunshilong Cc: Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Are there some potentially serious problems that I should be aware of if I totally disable the CONFIG_ACPI option on the X86_64 platform? Message-ID: <20200704122222.GB15530@amd> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > Are there some potentially serious problems that I should be aware of > if I totally disable the CONFIG_ACPI option on the X86_64 platform? >=20 > Would it do harm to the hardware? >=20 > Thank you for your attention to this matter. These machines are still mostly IBM-PC compatible, so it is likely to somehow work. You'll likely get worse power and thermal management. Try it. Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAl8AdH4ACgkQMOfwapXb+vIHTwCfQ9c9KX3/EY85Gm9wwa7Aeroq ZeYAnjmKW+l83cm4l1HFOWZTiiC/wwOU =/TjJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI--