From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A46C433DF for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B959920722 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="E2900dOp" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729383AbgGFPx3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:53:29 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40788 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729321AbgGFPx2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:53:28 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x543.google.com (mail-pg1-x543.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::543]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CF4DC061755 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 08:53:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x543.google.com with SMTP id o13so15607170pgf.0 for ; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 08:53:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=IaQi7Xp42ftquKfgwNd6G15TPvj7K9LsvnIqneB2JPM=; b=E2900dOp6ACJ2Rm6CME9oay/0h85cf3q6yzSh/VapfNYjWBQz9pWrlJ6JipPzD+tPH 7b4oYeCKTTv8mcNfjO2fSIyDDD78dsLcpTt2MOEYEjkLTes4QZVrOVXjXB9rW14fBNmw UlL1NFzXiL0Q3iFUMOrU5nnao1wywsR8TZ4/k= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=IaQi7Xp42ftquKfgwNd6G15TPvj7K9LsvnIqneB2JPM=; b=UjSjzP4maeVSbT56FZp6B/cgxBn9mwDyVdZHNw2n0y4j1/yFjTyKaFFwWgiCOpHo7Q IhWWYZNY+Xv9sizHabX9lbCI80v8IB2FFzbaEI9mj521eDXXrHBzZNLvyuJlEu1CJwR1 R+/R1qiY+62gAyCzCZkpwZ3kVvq88hw8xdiiodjj+XlSZkOqAQWMbCFsiqPylzHEMplh /6sW+Qn3gSdyEspqajggJKCjydOBloJL4CfPI95YhJUmUEO8iPkbxdPUnGh63v9/cy5b vpA3qXIDgJckSxOMjf4N5uJONWGVGpnB9aLEtfqphIzh2ihfuP86hX2n7irzjNcudoSL pFpA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530+NEsH6fyc4KgAwZBdXCEnFMOm9lC4T3Qdog4BGKyWcs46jW8m 1YIW4bFTXinLJ2WJM7oEVW48vQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyJlovwNXf7zCxj78F7E5i5D4JnbKX+EyYsl0M3/qGMeuAx1r4WbCmBjeR9tYH0R5iv7TEDzQ== X-Received: by 2002:a62:8489:: with SMTP id k131mr45654008pfd.4.1594050807911; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 08:53:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e191sm19488211pfh.42.2020.07.06.08.53.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 06 Jul 2020 08:53:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 08:53:25 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Cc: Matthew Wilcox , ksummit , Greg Kroah-Hartman , LKML , tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Chris Mason , expensivestephen@hotmail.com Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] [PATCH] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology Message-ID: <202007060853.07B4D4F9@keescook> References: <159389297140.2210796.13590142254668787525.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <920e6dc0-628b-9bad-926a-d1238a373cda@infradead.org> <202007041804.B5E229E2B6@keescook> <8c0c1050-3beb-86f6-f184-4687acffd61d@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8c0c1050-3beb-86f6-f184-4687acffd61d@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 01:15:38PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > On 7/5/20 3:10 AM, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 08:10:33PM -0400, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > >> Left-right tree makes no sense. It doesn't distinguish the rbtree from its > >> predecessor the avl tree. I don't think it's helpful to rename a standard > >> piece of computing terminology unless it's actually hurting us to have it. > >> Obviously if it were called a "master-slave" tree, I would be in favour of > >> renaming it. > > > > (No one has suggested renaming red/black trees, so I think the > > slippery-slope argument can be set aside here.) > > > > As for the actual proposal on white/black-list, I've always been annoyed > > by the poor description it provides (and I get to see it A LOT being > > the seccomp maintainer). I welcome allow/deny-list (though the change is > > not new for seccomp -- the man pages were updated last year (thanks > > mkerrisk). :) > > Actually, the manual pages are ahead of the game only thanks to > a nice presentation last year @OSS from Stephen Kenigbolo :-). Ah-ha, cool. I think I found it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtS_t3FHWe0 -- Kees Cook