From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9CCC433E0 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:35:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA9F2077D for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:35:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728291AbgGIQfU (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jul 2020 12:35:20 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35762 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726497AbgGIQfT (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jul 2020 12:35:19 -0400 Received: from oasis.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 519D62077D; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:35:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 12:35:16 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Mark Brown Cc: Shuah Khan , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Chris Mason , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Tibor Raschko Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology Message-ID: <20200709123516.3972dee8@oasis.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20200709161351.GF4960@sirena.org.uk> References: <79214066-3886-e0ef-f26e-8cb3d53404be@linuxfoundation.org> <20200709124327.369781a0@coco.lan> <93fc3afb-8c3f-0fb9-3b92-adfb6571e060@linuxfoundation.org> <20200709161351.GF4960@sirena.org.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 17:13:51 +0100 Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 10:01:18AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > > On 7/9/20 4:43 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > > For coherency, if "blacklist/whitelist" won't be used anymore, an > > > alternative to graylist should also be provided. > > > What is "graylist"? Does it mean in between allow/deny? > > Yes. Typically it's used in situations where you don't want to deny > something but might for example want to do extra checks to verify that > things are OK. The only time I use greylist is for postgrey, that when an email comes in, it will initially reject it, expecting the mail server to try again, and the second time it lets it through. This does stop a lot of spam, at the cost of waiting up to a few hours for email :-/ -- Steve