From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] printk: replace ringbuffer
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 10:28:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200710082833.GM4751@alley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200709132344.760-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de>
On Thu 2020-07-09 15:29:40, John Ogness wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is a v5 for the first series to rework the printk
> subsystem. The v4 is here [0]. This first series
> only replaces the existing ringbuffer implementation. No locking
> is removed. The semantics/behavior of printk are kept the same
> except for a minor optimization that is reverted (patch 3).
>
> John Ogness (4):
> crash: add VMCOREINFO macro to define offset in a struct declared by
> typedef
> printk: add lockless ringbuffer
> Revert "printk: lock/unlock console only for new logbuf entries"
> printk: use the lockless ringbuffer
The patchset is committed in printk/linux.git, branch printk-rework.
I did not add any target kernel version into the topic branch name.
We could use it for the entire rework. The pieces would go into
mainline when we and linux-next are happy.
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-10 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-09 13:23 [PATCH v5 0/4] printk: replace ringbuffer John Ogness
2020-07-09 13:23 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] crash: add VMCOREINFO macro to define offset in a struct declared by typedef John Ogness
2020-07-09 13:23 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] printk: add lockless ringbuffer John Ogness
2020-07-10 8:43 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-07-10 8:47 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-07-09 13:23 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] Revert "printk: lock/unlock console only for new logbuf entries" John Ogness
2020-07-09 13:23 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] printk: use the lockless ringbuffer John Ogness
2020-07-14 5:26 ` [printk] 96d5c61b1f: stress-ng.timerfd.ops_per_sec 8.3% improvement kernel test robot
2020-07-18 12:10 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] printk: use the lockless ringbuffer Marco Elver
2020-07-19 3:43 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-07-20 6:43 ` Marco Elver
2020-07-20 8:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-07-20 8:34 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-07-20 8:41 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-07-20 9:40 ` Marco Elver
2020-07-20 10:01 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-07-20 10:20 ` John Ogness
2020-07-20 10:32 ` Marco Elver
2020-08-11 20:47 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-08-12 16:40 ` John Ogness
2021-01-22 23:52 ` Issue in dmesg time with lockless ring buffer J. Avila
2021-01-25 13:32 ` John Ogness
2021-01-26 0:00 ` J. Avila
2021-01-29 1:46 ` J. Avila
2020-07-10 8:28 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2020-07-13 2:23 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] printk: replace ringbuffer Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200710082833.GM4751@alley \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).