From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53AADC433DF for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 02:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A252073E for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 02:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b="Y8df6wtM" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726742AbgGNCWu (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 22:22:50 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:53749 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726150AbgGNCWu (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 22:22:50 -0400 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B5PS76tcBz9sQt; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 12:22:47 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1594693368; bh=AFPB0ijJm1Rz6TMaKXC13/pjsN5PDvcIKjOmLwZ2p5Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=Y8df6wtMRWJL9PixGxmbRSY6dEJHG3OO/VXCcnn1Q7aa4H61uZcBPjcF8VMNYVkZk baTUjACcwX9nqs2ROB2Um0gt+o7ckKQpStre6sHItbNg2QSTKo+t8e5WlMx6XhHWZx fuuZufZdEC5X9eiPC15AJtacuwbmJ3p+MRejyE8Tomg3Mqt0R2+gk+xnA+UqoZXNMb RV/H4E/4OBowooPFJ+QAf7nm8I7pt/HTHaowGsZXXa+W5ymE891dPYFfGQw3iwFlbM 3jE9F5Ogmnr9Lb4PGyLT0CYsuNi2sUbRZqwfz0Bt5CG2B+U9Vdyz2IIPnjas2DQSPw MIi3OxxT6qCRA== Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 12:22:47 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Networking Cc: Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jiri Olsa Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree Message-ID: <20200714122247.797cf01e@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/g8e.JBOuf0Uvu.lVYygqL3j"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/g8e.JBOuf0Uvu.lVYygqL3j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: tmp/ccsqpVCY.s: Assembler messages: tmp/ccsqpVCY.s:78: Error: unrecognized symbol type "" tmp/ccsqpVCY.s:91: Error: unrecognized symbol type "" I don't know what has caused this (I guess maybe the resolve_btfids branch). I have used the bpf-next tree from next-20200713 for today. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/g8e.JBOuf0Uvu.lVYygqL3j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAl8NFvcACgkQAVBC80lX 0Gw1xAf9GiD9sP2Wu+cYyfBMKI2rsjZKp4jedskQTkMXxtjKluceG7PjMwY/IxCP onNnvBqE/6xpA4j2XGKC8E4LV/l2gW9ErTk/o6AOdkF1kWiOJ9c4r0th5DhQ+WiY mvUe/aTUVPmN90PB/sjD2tzpRJWEXYa9CQfq0vQJ+lUX3ceaRe648ExCnRF8OaJ5 wtXKbgFhqGsae3v2Dh9xzjBYQIAV+KpfE3+9KWTaYeeWJnhXePP+zsXwqsinFOoL J6baAwO6EhAdwnSksnPFGaCmRjCQE9i8y+3SaDH08X5804Mk9wqf5HnOeg6WjUga 2B8bJLemSRUO+kqlo4vU051+XWNr/w== =sWzY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/g8e.JBOuf0Uvu.lVYygqL3j--