From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
carlos <carlos@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
paulmck <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
linux-api <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] rseq: Allow extending struct rseq
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 15:55:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200715135554.4q6aamx4iqd4mnqh@wittgenstein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mu4028uk.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 03:42:11PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Mathieu Desnoyers:
>
> > So indeed it could be done today without upgrading the toolchains by
> > writing custom assembler for each architecture to get the thread's
> > struct rseq. AFAIU the ABI to access the thread pointer is fixed for
> > each architecture, right ?
>
> Yes, determining the thread pointer and access initial-exec TLS
> variables is baked into the ABI.
>
> > How would this allow early-rseq-adopter libraries to interact with
> > glibc ?
>
> Under all extension proposals I've seen so far, early adopters are
> essentially incompatible with glibc rseq registration. I don't think
> you can have it both ways.
Who are the early adopters? And if we aren't being compatible with them
under the extensible schemes proposed we should be able to achieve
compatibility with non-early adopters, right? Which I guess is more
important. (I still struggle to make sense what qualifies as an early
adopter/what the difference to a non-early adopter is.)
Christian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-15 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-14 3:03 [RFC PATCH 0/4] rseq: Introduce extensible struct rseq Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-14 3:03 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] selftests: rseq: Use fixed value as rseq_len parameter Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-14 3:03 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] rseq: Allow extending struct rseq Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-14 9:58 ` Florian Weimer
2020-07-14 12:50 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-14 13:00 ` Florian Weimer
2020-07-14 13:19 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-14 21:30 ` Carlos O'Donell
2020-07-15 13:12 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-15 13:22 ` Florian Weimer
2020-07-15 13:31 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-15 13:42 ` Florian Weimer
2020-07-15 13:55 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2020-07-15 14:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-15 14:54 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-15 14:58 ` Florian Weimer
2020-07-15 15:26 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-14 17:24 ` Peter Oskolkov
2020-07-14 17:43 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-14 18:33 ` Peter Oskolkov
2020-07-15 2:34 ` Chris Kennelly
2020-07-15 6:31 ` Florian Weimer
2020-07-15 10:59 ` Christian Brauner
2020-07-15 14:38 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-15 14:50 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-15 11:38 ` Christian Brauner
2020-07-15 12:33 ` Christian Brauner
2020-07-15 15:10 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-15 15:33 ` Christian Brauner
2020-07-14 3:03 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] selftests: rseq: define __rseq_abi with extensible size Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-14 3:03 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] selftests: rseq: print rseq extensible size in basic test Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-14 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] rseq: Introduce extensible struct rseq Carlos O'Donell
2020-07-15 13:02 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-16 13:39 ` Carlos O'Donell
2020-07-16 14:45 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-15 15:12 ` Florian Weimer
2020-07-15 15:32 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200715135554.4q6aamx4iqd4mnqh@wittgenstein \
--to=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).