From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A791C433E2 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:28:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7BF2078C for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:28:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728392AbgGPL2t (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jul 2020 07:28:49 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:17662 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726515AbgGPL2s (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jul 2020 07:28:48 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06GB0dF3117895; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 07:28:47 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 329r1jw0k3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 16 Jul 2020 07:28:47 -0400 Received: from m0098419.ppops.net (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 06GB1awn122780; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 07:28:46 -0400 Received: from ppma05fra.de.ibm.com (6c.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.108]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 329r1jw0je-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 16 Jul 2020 07:28:46 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma05fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma05fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06GBPgp3003813; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:28:45 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by ppma05fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 327q2y2f01-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:28:44 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 06GBSgSX30671044 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:28:42 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76AC84C050; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:28:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8804C046; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:28:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from osiris (unknown [9.171.13.43]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:28:42 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 13:28:40 +0200 From: Heiko Carstens To: Nick Desaulniers Cc: Vasily Gorbik , linux-s390 , clang-built-linux , LKML Subject: Re: linux plumbers + clang + s390 virtualized testing Message-ID: <20200716112840.GC8484@osiris> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235,18.0.687 definitions=2020-07-16_05:2020-07-16,2020-07-16 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1011 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=1 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2007160084 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Nick, > We were very excited to see your patches going by for enabling Clang > support for s390. Since then, we've added s390 builds to our > continuous integration setup. > > We've been running into a few issues with doing virtualized boot tests > of our kernels on s390. > > I was curious if you'll both be attending Linux plumbers conf? If we > carve out time for an s390+clang talk, would this be of interest to > you to attend? I will not attend, however cannot speak for Vasily. He will have to answer as soon as he returns - besides that enabling Clang support for s390 was done by Vasily anyway :)