linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jay Zhou <jianjay.zhou@huawei.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <alex.williamson@redhat.com>, <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	<maoming.maoming@huawei.com>, <jianjay.zhou@huawei.com>,
	<weidong.huang@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] vfio dma_map/unmap: optimized for hugetlbfs pages
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 16:29:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200720082947.1770-1-jianjay.zhou@huawei.com> (raw)

From: Ming Mao <maoming.maoming@huawei.com>

Hi all,
I'm working on starting lots of big size
Virtual Machines(memory: >128GB) with VFIO-devices. And I
encounter a problem that is the waiting time of starting
all Virtual Machines is too long. I analyze the startup log
and find that the time of pinning/unpinning pages could be reduced.

In the original process, to make sure the pages are contiguous,
we have to check all pages one by one. I think maybe we can use
hugetlbfs pages which can skip this step.
So I create a patch to do this.
According to my test, the result of this patch is pretty well.

Virtual Machine: 50G memory, 32 CPU, 1 VFIO-device, 1G hugetlbfs page
        original   after optimization
pin time   700ms          0.1ms

I Suppose that:
1)the hugetlbfs page should not be split
2)PG_reserved is not relevant for hugetlbfs pages
3)we can delete the for loops and use some operations
(such as atomic_add,page_ref_add) instead

please correct me if I am wrong.

Thanks.

Signed-off-by: Ming Mao <maoming.maoming@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 236 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 include/linux/vfio.h            |  20 +++
 2 files changed, 246 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
index 5e556ac91..42e25752e 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
@@ -415,6 +415,46 @@ static int put_pfn(unsigned long pfn, int prot)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * put pfns for a hugetlbfs page
+ * @start:the 4KB-page we start to put,can be any page in this hugetlbfs page
+ * @npage:the number of 4KB-pages need to put
+ * @prot:IOMMU_READ/WRITE
+ */
+static int hugetlb_put_pfn(unsigned long start, unsigned int npage, int prot)
+{
+	struct page *page = NULL;
+	struct page *head = NULL;
+
+	if (!npage || !pfn_valid(start))
+		return 0;
+
+	page = pfn_to_page(start);
+	if (!page || !PageHuge(page))
+		return 0;
+	head = compound_head(page);
+	/*
+	 * The last page should be in this hugetlbfs page.
+	 * The number of putting pages should be equal to the number
+	 * of getting pages.So the hugepage pinned refcount and the normal
+	 * page refcount can not be smaller than npage.
+	 */
+	if ((head != compound_head(pfn_to_page(start + npage - 1)))
+	    || (page_ref_count(head) < npage)
+	    || (compound_pincount(page) < npage))
+		return 0;
+
+	if ((prot & IOMMU_WRITE) && !PageDirty(page))
+		set_page_dirty_lock(page);
+
+	atomic_sub(npage, compound_pincount_ptr(head));
+	if (page_ref_sub_and_test(head, npage))
+		__put_page(head);
+
+	mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(head), NR_FOLL_PIN_RELEASED, npage);
+	return 1;
+}
+
 static int follow_fault_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct mm_struct *mm,
 			    unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long *pfn,
 			    bool write_fault)
@@ -479,6 +519,90 @@ static int vaddr_get_pfn(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+struct vfio_hupetlbpage_info vfio_hugetlbpage_info[HUGE_MAX_HSTATE] = {
+	{vfio_hugetlbpage_2M, PMD_SIZE, ~((1ULL << HPAGE_PMD_SHIFT) - 1)},
+	{vfio_hugetlbpage_1G, PUD_SIZE, ~((1ULL << HPAGE_PUD_SHIFT) - 1)},
+};
+
+static bool is_hugetlbpage(unsigned long pfn, enum vfio_hugetlbpage_type *type)
+{
+	struct page *page = NULL;
+
+	if (!pfn_valid(pfn) || !type)
+		return false;
+
+	page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
+	/* only check for hugetlbfs pages */
+	if (!page || !PageHuge(page))
+		return false;
+
+	switch (compound_order(compound_head(page))) {
+	case PMD_ORDER:
+		*type = vfio_hugetlbpage_2M;
+		break;
+	case PUD_ORDER:
+		*type = vfio_hugetlbpage_1G;
+		break;
+	default:
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+/* Is the addr in the last page in hugetlbfs pages? */
+static bool hugetlb_is_last_page(unsigned long addr, enum vfio_hugetlbpage_type type)
+{
+	unsigned int num = 0;
+
+	num = hugetlb_get_resdual_pages(addr & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1), type);
+
+	if (num == 1)
+		return true;
+	else
+		return false;
+}
+
+static bool hugetlb_page_is_pinned(struct vfio_dma *dma,
+				unsigned long start,
+				unsigned long npages)
+{
+	struct vfio_pfn *vpfn = NULL;
+	struct rb_node *node = rb_first(&dma->pfn_list);
+	unsigned long end = start + npages - 1;
+
+	for (; node; node = rb_next(node)) {
+		vpfn = rb_entry(node, struct vfio_pfn, node);
+
+		if ((vpfn->pfn >= start) && (vpfn->pfn <= end))
+			return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+static unsigned int hugetlb_get_contiguous_pages_num(struct vfio_dma *dma,
+						unsigned long pfn,
+						unsigned long resdual_npage,
+						unsigned long max_npage)
+{
+	unsigned int num = 0;
+
+	if (!dma)
+		return 0;
+
+	num = resdual_npage < max_npage ? resdual_npage : max_npage;
+	/*
+	 * If there is only one page, it is no need to optimize them.
+	 * Maybe some pages have been pinned and inserted into dma->pfn_list by others.
+	 * In this case, we just goto the slow path simply.
+	 */
+	if ((num < 2) || hugetlb_page_is_pinned(dma, pfn, num))
+		return 0;
+
+	return num;
+}
+
 /*
  * Attempt to pin pages.  We really don't want to track all the pfns and
  * the iommu can only map chunks of consecutive pfns anyway, so get the
@@ -492,6 +616,7 @@ static long vfio_pin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma *dma, unsigned long vaddr,
 	long ret, pinned = 0, lock_acct = 0;
 	bool rsvd;
 	dma_addr_t iova = vaddr - dma->vaddr + dma->iova;
+	enum vfio_hugetlbpage_type type;
 
 	/* This code path is only user initiated */
 	if (!current->mm)
@@ -521,6 +646,55 @@ static long vfio_pin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma *dma, unsigned long vaddr,
 	if (unlikely(disable_hugepages))
 		goto out;
 
+	/*
+	 * It is no need to get pages one by one for hugetlbfs pages.
+	 * 4KB-pages in hugetlbfs pages are contiguous.
+	 * But if the vaddr is in the last 4KB-page, we just goto the slow path.
+	 */
+	if (is_hugetlbpage(*pfn_base, &type) && !hugetlb_is_last_page(vaddr, type)) {
+		unsigned long hugetlb_resdual_npage = 0;
+		unsigned long contiguous_npage = 0;
+		struct page *head = NULL;
+
+		hugetlb_resdual_npage =
+			hugetlb_get_resdual_pages((vaddr + PAGE_SIZE) & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1), type);
+		/*
+		 * Maybe the hugetlb_resdual_npage is invalid.
+		 * For example, hugetlb_resdual_npage > (npage - 1) or
+		 * some pages of this hugetlbfs page have been pinned.
+		 */
+		contiguous_npage = hugetlb_get_contiguous_pages_num(dma, *pfn_base + 1,
+						hugetlb_resdual_npage, npage - 1);
+		if (!contiguous_npage)
+			goto slow_path;
+
+		/*
+		 * Unlike THP, the splitting should not happen for hugetlbfs pages.
+		 * Since PG_reserved is not relevant for compound pages, and the pfn of
+		 * 4KB-page which in hugetlbfs pages is valid,
+		 * it is no need to check rsvd for hugetlbfs pages.
+		 */
+		if (!dma->lock_cap &&
+		    current->mm->locked_vm + lock_acct + contiguous_npage > limit) {
+			pr_warn("%s: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK (%ld) exceeded\n",
+				 __func__, limit << PAGE_SHIFT);
+			ret = -ENOMEM;
+			goto unpin_out;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * We got a hugetlbfs page using vaddr_get_pfn alreadly.
+		 * In this case,we do not need to alloc pages and we can finish all
+		 * work by a single operation to the head page.
+		 */
+		lock_acct += contiguous_npage;
+		head = compound_head(pfn_to_page(*pfn_base));
+		atomic_add(contiguous_npage, compound_pincount_ptr(head));
+		page_ref_add(head, contiguous_npage);
+		mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(head), NR_FOLL_PIN_ACQUIRED, contiguous_npage);
+		pinned += contiguous_npage;
+		goto out;
+	}
+slow_path:
 	/* Lock all the consecutive pages from pfn_base */
 	for (vaddr += PAGE_SIZE, iova += PAGE_SIZE; pinned < npage;
 	     pinned++, vaddr += PAGE_SIZE, iova += PAGE_SIZE) {
@@ -569,7 +743,30 @@ static long vfio_unpin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma *dma, dma_addr_t iova,
 {
 	long unlocked = 0, locked = 0;
 	long i;
+	enum vfio_hugetlbpage_type type;
+
+	if (is_hugetlbpage(pfn, &type)) {
+		unsigned long hugetlb_resdual_npage = 0;
+		unsigned long contiguous_npage = 0;
 
+		hugetlb_resdual_npage = hugetlb_get_resdual_pages(iova & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1), type);
+		contiguous_npage = hugetlb_get_contiguous_pages_num(dma, pfn,
+						hugetlb_resdual_npage, npage);
+		/*
+		 * There is not enough contiguous pages or this hugetlbfs page
+		 * has been pinned.
+		 * Let's try the slow path.
+		 */
+		if (!contiguous_npage)
+			goto slow_path;
+
+		/* try the slow path if failed */
+		if (hugetlb_put_pfn(pfn, contiguous_npage, dma->prot)) {
+			unlocked = contiguous_npage;
+			goto out;
+		}
+	}
+slow_path:
 	for (i = 0; i < npage; i++, iova += PAGE_SIZE) {
 		if (put_pfn(pfn++, dma->prot)) {
 			unlocked++;
@@ -578,6 +775,7 @@ static long vfio_unpin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma *dma, dma_addr_t iova,
 		}
 	}
 
+out:
 	if (do_accounting)
 		vfio_lock_acct(dma, locked - unlocked, true);
 
@@ -867,6 +1065,7 @@ static long vfio_unmap_unpin(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma,
 	struct iommu_iotlb_gather iotlb_gather;
 	int unmapped_region_cnt = 0;
 	long unlocked = 0;
+	enum vfio_hugetlbpage_type type;
 
 	if (!dma->size)
 		return 0;
@@ -900,16 +1099,33 @@ static long vfio_unmap_unpin(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma,
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		/*
-		 * To optimize for fewer iommu_unmap() calls, each of which
-		 * may require hardware cache flushing, try to find the
-		 * largest contiguous physical memory chunk to unmap.
-		 */
-		for (len = PAGE_SIZE;
-		     !domain->fgsp && iova + len < end; len += PAGE_SIZE) {
-			next = iommu_iova_to_phys(domain->domain, iova + len);
-			if (next != phys + len)
-				break;
+		if (is_hugetlbpage((phys >> PAGE_SHIFT), &type)
+		    && (!domain->fgsp)) {
+			unsigned long hugetlb_resdual_npage = 0;
+			unsigned long contiguous_npage = 0;
+
+			hugetlb_resdual_npage =
+				hugetlb_get_resdual_pages(iova & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1), type);
+			/*
+			 * The number of contiguous page can not be larger than dma->size
+			 * which is the number of pages pinned.
+			 */
+			contiguous_npage = ((dma->size >> PAGE_SHIFT) > hugetlb_resdual_npage) ?
+				hugetlb_resdual_npage : (dma->size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+
+			len = contiguous_npage * PAGE_SIZE;
+		} else {
+			/*
+			 * To optimize for fewer iommu_unmap() calls, each of which
+			 * may require hardware cache flushing, try to find the
+			 * largest contiguous physical memory chunk to unmap.
+			 */
+			for (len = PAGE_SIZE;
+			     !domain->fgsp && iova + len < end; len += PAGE_SIZE) {
+				next = iommu_iova_to_phys(domain->domain, iova + len);
+				if (next != phys + len)
+					break;
+			}
 		}
 
 		/*
diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
index 38d3c6a8d..91ef2058f 100644
--- a/include/linux/vfio.h
+++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
@@ -214,4 +214,24 @@ extern int vfio_virqfd_enable(void *opaque,
 			      void *data, struct virqfd **pvirqfd, int fd);
 extern void vfio_virqfd_disable(struct virqfd **pvirqfd);
 
+enum vfio_hugetlbpage_type {
+	vfio_hugetlbpage_2M,
+	vfio_hugetlbpage_1G,
+};
+
+struct vfio_hupetlbpage_info {
+	enum vfio_hugetlbpage_type type;
+	unsigned long size;
+	unsigned long mask;
+};
+
+#define PMD_ORDER 9
+#define PUD_ORDER 18
+/*
+ * get the number of resdual 4KB-pages in a hugetlbfs page
+ * (including the page which pointed by this address)
+ */
+#define hugetlb_get_resdual_pages(address, type)				\
+		((vfio_hugetlbpage_info[type].size				\
+		- (address & ~vfio_hugetlbpage_info[type].mask)) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
 #endif /* VFIO_H */
-- 
2.23.0



             reply	other threads:[~2020-07-20  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-20  8:29 Jay Zhou [this message]
2020-07-20 14:24 ` [PATCH] vfio dma_map/unmap: optimized for hugetlbfs pages kernel test robot
2020-07-20 22:46 ` Alex Williamson
2020-07-21 13:28   ` Zhoujian (jay)
2020-08-13  6:11     ` 答复: " Maoming (maoming, Cloud Infrastructure Service Product Dept.)
2020-07-22  0:48   ` Peter Xu
2020-07-20 23:38 ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200720082947.1770-1-jianjay.zhou@huawei.com \
    --to=jianjay.zhou@huawei.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maoming.maoming@huawei.com \
    --cc=weidong.huang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).