From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50EAFC433E2 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 12:19:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2287922482 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 12:19:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1595333984; bh=tYiFt9K0KgLaJqfcIjAbyvfdUGbdTgTCD4rZc3DjcYA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=UDDGNgrTP7qaKorY3QQGmSNvoRajGjZjmzZMK8nhn+ZV/i2Knl7rRYY7ssL4okSlU 4R/LfT7G8ojL3ytp1K9wcmP/x4yr58fE3mdmuwPS6jTbEMTp/x39Cw71awnfJ4LH80 CSPwJiWcXldAxymW8JXW1lN+ydOG9x5w0hnzuwZw= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729793AbgGUMTm (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2020 08:19:42 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49316 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726715AbgGUMTm (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2020 08:19:42 -0400 Received: from localhost (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4270921702; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 12:19:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1595333981; bh=tYiFt9K0KgLaJqfcIjAbyvfdUGbdTgTCD4rZc3DjcYA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=0gBks7Fved2h4ynjBOKZV1EWo/pc3D5lNhYOqvqEF1cdh67WnU3bXnN5ZCzEsyuBL U/0Q0BFevG1Y211wv1SiNjrSbtpaEv7ZQAuHM8sxXEII5xkLdZYJQNf4+DZfBA/GKK beed3Mjc3l7zNlDp/h6AeG8lcAbxhFXop8+DcKUU= Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 13:19:28 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Saravana Kannan Cc: Liam Girdwood , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Marek Szyprowski , John Stultz , LKML , Android Kernel Team Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] regulator: core: Add voltage support for sync_state() callbacks Message-ID: <20200721121928.GC4845@sirena.org.uk> References: <20200716042053.1927676-1-saravanak@google.com> <20200716042053.1927676-5-saravanak@google.com> <20200720143533.GG4601@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GZVR6ND4mMseVXL/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: I'm also against BODY-SURFING!! User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --GZVR6ND4mMseVXL/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 08:24:59PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote: > Btw, going a tangent, why is regulator_set_voltage() not dependent on > a consumer's regulator enable request? If they don't care if the > regulator goes off, do they really care if the voltage goes lower? > What's the reason behind not tying voltage request with the enable > request? The most important thing is being able to control the conditions at power on and power off, the period while the power is off is not so important. --GZVR6ND4mMseVXL/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl8W3U8ACgkQJNaLcl1U h9CAhQf/ftgm8KcIBAgxoW/cPvbNxLl6Nz+pM5nmTnjmmY47Ll9Dj1e3pTDg9tst C0B/DBN2tFM/u0ltuKWG15BF2TSU3axy05nTUDLvEvnEZkW0TuWtlyU4cizAabcV mMTWaBazJDTRctAAVfRE8yLb0f4quQoOty8Dds5c9QR8Qp5Vr/0UtonJunN/s0JY gkbisQzTcrwxsmpM1NVSLHGjsmRxD3Nbrw+Pq9muqD8Vu4zxwX0ERqdWTuaYRW/S 4HlGb+2AWPGyGHfwaoubV2PxDEkcihErWgToX7WPqCAF7IErBVKb9SYwN9pb8JRL /AD4UaLcKWcHdjl1MGMMjjY4dUckEg== =6YfP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GZVR6ND4mMseVXL/--