From: Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Sleep waiting for tcs slots to be free
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 14:23:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200724202351.GK9185@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159562149056.3847286.11191144133990578500@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Fri, Jul 24 2020 at 14:11 -0600, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>Quoting Lina Iyer (2020-07-24 13:08:41)
>> On Fri, Jul 24 2020 at 14:01 -0600, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> >Quoting Doug Anderson (2020-07-24 12:49:56)
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:44 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> wrote:
>> >I think Lina was alluding to this earlier in this
>> >thread.
>> I was thinking more of threaded irq handler than a kthread to post the
>> requests. We went away from post-thread approach a few years ago.
>>
>
>Ok, got it. Why was the kthread approach abandoned?
Simplification mostly, I think. Also, somebody requested that when the
async call returns they would atleast be guaranteed that the request has
been posted not necessarily processed at the remote end.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-24 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-23 1:01 [PATCH] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Sleep waiting for tcs slots to be free Stephen Boyd
2020-07-23 17:42 ` Lina Iyer
2020-07-23 19:36 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-07-24 17:42 ` Doug Anderson
2020-07-24 19:44 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-07-24 19:49 ` Doug Anderson
2020-07-24 20:01 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-07-24 20:08 ` Lina Iyer
2020-07-24 20:11 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-07-24 20:23 ` Lina Iyer [this message]
2020-07-24 20:11 ` Doug Anderson
2020-07-24 20:27 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-07-24 20:31 ` Doug Anderson
2020-07-24 21:08 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200724202351.GK9185@codeaurora.org \
--to=ilina@codeaurora.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkshah@codeaurora.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).