From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A198CC433E4 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A12E2065C for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731343AbgG1QPG (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:15:06 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:46574 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730586AbgG1QPG (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:15:06 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDBD7B5BF; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:15:15 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:15:03 +0200 From: Daniel Wagner To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Remove callback typedefs for blk_mq_ops Message-ID: <20200728161503.657ch75lxbky4tvb@beryllium.lan> References: <20200728160506.92926-1-dwagner@suse.de> <7a26c550-934b-a188-b910-3d21d006df41@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7a26c550-934b-a188-b910-3d21d006df41@kernel.dk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 10:13:06AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 7/28/20 10:05 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote: > > No need to define typedefs for the callbacks, because there is not a > > single user except blk_mq_ops. > > Concept looks fine to me, but you're mixing indentations a bit. Just > remove the indentation bits, we don't need them here. Ok, in fact I was not sure about the indentation. Let me respin it.