From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 18/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for hashtab maps
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 14:22:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200730212310.2609108-19-guro@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200730212310.2609108-1-guro@fb.com>
Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for hashtab maps.
It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting.
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
---
kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 19 +------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
index 9d0432170812..9372b559b4e7 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
@@ -422,7 +422,6 @@ static struct bpf_map *htab_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
bool percpu_lru = (attr->map_flags & BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU);
bool prealloc = !(attr->map_flags & BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
struct bpf_htab *htab;
- u64 cost;
int err;
htab = kzalloc(sizeof(*htab), GFP_USER | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
@@ -459,26 +458,12 @@ static struct bpf_map *htab_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
htab->n_buckets > U32_MAX / sizeof(struct bucket))
goto free_htab;
- cost = (u64) htab->n_buckets * sizeof(struct bucket) +
- (u64) htab->elem_size * htab->map.max_entries;
-
- if (percpu)
- cost += (u64) round_up(htab->map.value_size, 8) *
- num_possible_cpus() * htab->map.max_entries;
- else
- cost += (u64) htab->elem_size * num_possible_cpus();
-
- /* if map size is larger than memlock limit, reject it */
- err = bpf_map_charge_init(&htab->map.memory, cost);
- if (err)
- goto free_htab;
-
err = -ENOMEM;
htab->buckets = bpf_map_area_alloc(htab->n_buckets *
sizeof(struct bucket),
htab->map.numa_node);
if (!htab->buckets)
- goto free_charge;
+ goto free_htab;
if (htab->map.map_flags & BPF_F_ZERO_SEED)
htab->hashrnd = 0;
@@ -508,8 +493,6 @@ static struct bpf_map *htab_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
prealloc_destroy(htab);
free_buckets:
bpf_map_area_free(htab->buckets);
-free_charge:
- bpf_map_charge_finish(&htab->map.memory);
free_htab:
kfree(htab);
return ERR_PTR(err);
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-30 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-30 21:22 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/29] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/29] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-07-31 22:48 ` Song Liu
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/29] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/29] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/29] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/29] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/29] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/29] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/29] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/29] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/29] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for socket storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/29] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/29] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 13/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 14/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf_struct_ops maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 15/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 16/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 17/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2020-07-30 21:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 19/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 20/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for queue_stack_maps maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 21/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for reuseport_array maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 22/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 23/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 24/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for stackmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 25/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for socket storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 26/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 27/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting infra for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-31 22:47 ` Song Liu
2020-07-30 21:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 28/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 29/29] bpf: samples: do not touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Roman Gushchin
2020-08-03 12:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/29] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Daniel Borkmann
2020-08-03 15:34 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-08-03 16:39 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-08-03 17:05 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-08-03 18:37 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-08-03 19:06 ` Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200730212310.2609108-19-guro@fb.com \
--to=guro@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).