From: "josh@joshtriplett.org" <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: "Bird, Tim" <Tim.Bird@sony.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ksummit <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] Planning code obsolescence
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 15:47:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200731224704.GF32670@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR13MB1175A3B5D9DE33D3A1E045A6FD4E0@CY4PR13MB1175.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 09:57:41PM +0000, Bird, Tim wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: josh@joshtriplett.org
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 05:00:12PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > The majority of the code in the kernel deals with hardware that was made
> > > a long time ago, and we are regularly discussing which of those bits are
> > > still needed. In some cases (e.g. 20+ year old RISC workstation support),
> > > there are hobbyists that take care of maintainership despite there being
> > > no commercial interest. In other cases (e.g. x.25 networking) it turned
> > > out that there are very long-lived products that are actively supported
> > > on new kernels.
> > >
> > > When I removed support for eight instruction set architectures in 2018,
> > > those were the ones that no longer had any users of mainline kernels,
> > > and removing them allowed later cleanup of cross-architecture code that
> > > would have been much harder before.
> > >
> > > I propose adding a Documentation file that keeps track of any notable
> > > kernel feature that could be classified as "obsolete", and listing
> > > e.g. following properties:
> > >
> > > * Kconfig symbol controlling the feature
> > >
> > > * How long we expect to keep it as a minimum
> > >
> > > * Known use cases, or other reasons this needs to stay
> > >
> > > * Latest kernel in which it was known to have worked
> > >
> > > * Contact information for known users (mailing list, personal email)
> > >
> > > * Other features that may depend on this
> > >
> > > * Possible benefits of eventually removing it
> >
> > We had this once, in the form of feature-removal-schedule.txt. It was,
> > itself, removed in commit 9c0ece069b32e8e122aea71aa47181c10eb85ba7.
> >
> > I *do* think there'd be value in having policies and processes for "how
> > do we carefully remove a driver/architecture/etc we think nobody cares
> > about". That's separate from having an actual in-kernel list of "things
> > we think we can remove".
>
> I'm not sure the documents are the same. I think what Arnd is proposing
> is more of a "why is this thing still here?" document. When someone does
> research into who's still using a feature and why, that can be valuable information
> to share so that future maintenance or removal decisions can be better informed.
>
> Maybe e-mails are sufficient for this, but they'd be harder to find than something in
> the kernel source. But that supposes that people would look at the file, which
> appears didn't happen with feature-removal-schedule.txt.
Ah, I see. So this *isn't* about "features we want to remove", this is
"features people might think we should remove, but here's the
documentation for why we aren't"? More of an
obscure-but-still-wanted-features.txt?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-31 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-31 15:00 [TECH TOPIC] Planning code obsolescence Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-31 21:27 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " josh
2020-07-31 21:57 ` Bird, Tim
2020-07-31 22:47 ` josh [this message]
2020-08-05 17:26 ` Pavel Machek
2020-08-05 18:50 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-08-05 19:30 ` Pavel Machek
2020-08-10 19:39 ` Olof Johansson
2020-08-16 12:53 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200731224704.GF32670@localhost \
--to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=Tim.Bird@sony.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).