From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A09C433E0 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 05:53:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B362073E for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 05:53:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729817AbgHDFxQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2020 01:53:16 -0400 Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([62.96.220.36]:46504 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726398AbgHDFxP (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2020 01:53:15 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF3C20569; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 07:53:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wUQIudoOJEBl; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 07:53:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-essen-01.secunet.de (mail-essen-01.secunet.de [10.53.40.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 655A3201D5; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 07:53:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) by mail-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 07:53:11 +0200 Received: from gauss2.secunet.de (10.182.7.193) by mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 07:53:10 +0200 Received: by gauss2.secunet.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7E20831803A0; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 07:53:10 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 07:53:10 +0200 From: Steffen Klassert To: David Miller CC: , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ip_vti: Fix unused variable warning Message-ID: <20200804055310.GK20687@gauss3.secunet.de> References: <20200731064952.36900-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com> <20200803.151349.926022361234213749.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200803.151349.926022361234213749.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-ClientProxiedBy: cas-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.201) To mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 03:13:49PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: YueHaibing > Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 14:49:52 +0800 > > > If CONFIG_INET_XFRM_TUNNEL is set but CONFIG_IPV6 is n, > > > > net/ipv4/ip_vti.c:493:27: warning: 'vti_ipip6_handler' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] > > > > Signed-off-by: YueHaibing > > Steffen, please pick this up if you haven't already. I still have this one in my queue, it came in after I did the the ipsec-next pull request last week. Now the 5.8 release was inbetween, so it should go to the ipsec tree. I'm waiting until I can backmerge the offending patch into the ipsec tree and apply it then. Alternatively to speed things up, you can take it directly into net-next before you do the pull request to Linus. In case you prefer that: Acked-by: Steffen Klassert