linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Po-Hsu Lin <po-hsu.lin@canonical.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] selftests: rtnetlink: make kci_test_encap() return sub-test result
Date: Tue,  4 Aug 2020 18:18:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200804101803.23062-3-po-hsu.lin@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200804101803.23062-1-po-hsu.lin@canonical.com>

kci_test_encap() is actually composed by two different sub-tests,
kci_test_encap_vxlan() and kci_test_encap_fou()

Therefore we should check the test result of these two in
kci_test_encap() to let the script be aware of the pass / fail status.
Otherwise it will generate false-negative result like below:
    $ sudo ./test.sh
    PASS: policy routing
    PASS: route get
    PASS: preferred_lft addresses have expired
    PASS: promote_secondaries complete
    PASS: tc htb hierarchy
    PASS: gre tunnel endpoint
    PASS: gretap
    PASS: ip6gretap
    PASS: erspan
    PASS: ip6erspan
    PASS: bridge setup
    PASS: ipv6 addrlabel
    PASS: set ifalias 5b193daf-0a08-46d7-af2c-e7aadd422ded for test-dummy0
    PASS: vrf
    PASS: vxlan
    FAIL: can't add fou port 7777, skipping test
    PASS: macsec
    PASS: bridge fdb get
    PASS: neigh get
    $ echo $?
    0

Signed-off-by: Po-Hsu Lin <po-hsu.lin@canonical.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh
index 9db66be..7c38a90 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh
@@ -564,9 +564,12 @@ kci_test_encap()
 	check_err $?
 
 	kci_test_encap_vxlan "$testns"
+	check_err $?
 	kci_test_encap_fou "$testns"
+	check_err $?
 
 	ip netns del "$testns"
+	return $ret
 }
 
 kci_test_macsec()
-- 
2.7.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-04 10:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-04 10:18 [PATCH 0/2] selftests: rtnetlink: Fix for false-negative return values Po-Hsu Lin
2020-08-04 10:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] selftests: rtnetlink: correct the final return value for the test Po-Hsu Lin
2020-08-04 10:18 ` Po-Hsu Lin [this message]
2020-08-05 19:23 ` [PATCH 0/2] selftests: rtnetlink: Fix for false-negative return values David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200804101803.23062-3-po-hsu.lin@canonical.com \
    --to=po-hsu.lin@canonical.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).