linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Enzo Matsumiya <ematsumiya@suse.com>,
	Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] block: check queue's limits.discard_granularity in __blkdev_issue_discard()
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 08:48:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200805154843.GB191798@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200805063150.41037-1-colyli@suse.de>

On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 02:31:50PM +0800, Coly Li wrote:
> If create a loop device with a backing NVMe SSD, current loop device
> driver doesn't correctly set its  queue's limits.discard_granularity and
> leaves it as 0. If a discard request at LBA 0 on this loop device, in
> __blkdev_issue_discard() the calculated req_sects will be 0, and a zero
> length discard request will trigger a BUG() panic in generic block layer
> code at block/blk-mq.c:563.
> 
> [  955.565006][   C39] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [  955.559660][   C39] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
> [  955.622171][   C39] CPU: 39 PID: 248 Comm: ksoftirqd/39 Tainted: G            E     5.8.0-default+ #40
> [  955.622171][   C39] Hardware name: Lenovo ThinkSystem SR650 -[7X05CTO1WW]-/-[7X05CTO1WW]-, BIOS -[IVE160M-2.70]- 07/17/2020
> [  955.622175][   C39] RIP: 0010:blk_mq_end_request+0x107/0x110
> [  955.622177][   C39] Code: 48 8b 03 e9 59 ff ff ff 48 89 df 5b 5d 41 5c e9 9f ed ff ff 48 8b 35 98 3c f4 00 48 83 c7 10 48 83 c6 19 e8 cb 56 c9 ff eb cb <0f> 0b 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 89 e5 41 56 41 54
> [  955.622179][   C39] RSP: 0018:ffffb1288701fe28 EFLAGS: 00010202
> [  955.749277][   C39] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff956fffba5080 RCX: 0000000000004003
> [  955.749278][   C39] RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
> [  955.749279][   C39] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> [  955.749279][   C39] R10: ffffb1288701fd28 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffffffa8e05160
> [  955.749280][   C39] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000004 R15: ffffffffa7ad3a1e
> [  955.749281][   C39] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff95bfbda00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [  955.749282][   C39] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [  955.749282][   C39] CR2: 00007f6f0ef766a8 CR3: 0000005a37012002 CR4: 00000000007606e0
> [  955.749283][   C39] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> [  955.749284][   C39] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> [  955.749284][   C39] PKRU: 55555554
> [  955.749285][   C39] Call Trace:
> [  955.749290][   C39]  blk_done_softirq+0x99/0xc0
> [  957.550669][   C39]  __do_softirq+0xd3/0x45f
> [  957.550677][   C39]  ? smpboot_thread_fn+0x2f/0x1e0
> [  957.550679][   C39]  ? smpboot_thread_fn+0x74/0x1e0
> [  957.550680][   C39]  ? smpboot_thread_fn+0x14e/0x1e0
> [  957.550684][   C39]  run_ksoftirqd+0x30/0x60
> [  957.550687][   C39]  smpboot_thread_fn+0x149/0x1e0
> [  957.886225][   C39]  ? sort_range+0x20/0x20
> [  957.886226][   C39]  kthread+0x137/0x160
> [  957.886228][   C39]  ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
> [  957.886231][   C39]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
> [  959.117120][   C39] ---[ end trace 3dacdac97e2ed164 ]---
> 
> This is the procedure to reproduce the panic,
>   # modprobe scsi_debug delay=0 dev_size_mb=2048 max_queue=1
>   # losetup -f /dev/nvme0n1 --direct-io=on
>   # blkdiscard /dev/loop0 -o 0 -l 0x200
> 
> This patch fixes the issue by checking q->limits.discard_granularity in
> __blkdev_issue_discard() before composing the discard bio. If the value
> is 0, then prints a warning oops information and returns -EOPNOTSUPP to
> the caller to indicate that this buggy device driver doesn't support
> discard request.
> 
> Fixes: 9b15d109a6b2 ("block: improve discard bio alignment in __blkdev_issue_discard()")
> Fixes: c52abf563049 ("loop: Better discard support for block devices")
> Reported-and-suggested-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Enzo Matsumiya <ematsumiya@suse.com>
> Cc: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
> Cc: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
> v3: print device name assocated with the buggy driver.
> v2: fix typo of the wrong return error code.
> v1: first version.
> 
>  block/blk-lib.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c
> index 019e09bb9c0e..d3bbb3d9fac3 100644
> --- a/block/blk-lib.c
> +++ b/block/blk-lib.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,15 @@ int __blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
>  		op = REQ_OP_DISCARD;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* In case the discard granularity isn't set by buggy device driver */
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!q->limits.discard_granularity)) {
> +		char dev_name[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
> +
> +		bdevname(bdev, dev_name);
> +		pr_err("%s: Error: discard_granularity is 0.\n", dev_name);

Hm, you might want to ratelimit this, before some buggy device +
careless program flood dmesg.

Also, why is it necessary to WARN_ON_ONCE /and/ pr_err the same
condition?

--D

> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +	}
> +
>  	bs_mask = (bdev_logical_block_size(bdev) >> 9) - 1;
>  	if ((sector | nr_sects) & bs_mask)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-05 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-05  6:31 [PATCH v3] block: check queue's limits.discard_granularity in __blkdev_issue_discard() Coly Li
2020-08-05  6:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-05  9:22 ` Jinpu Wang
2020-08-05  9:46   ` Coly Li
2020-08-05 15:48 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-08-05 16:49   ` Coly Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200805154843.GB191798@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=colyli@suse.de \
    --cc=ematsumiya@suse.com \
    --cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=xni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).