linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au,
	longman@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: ks7010: Do not use GFP_KERNEL in atomic context
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 13:17:47 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200811101746.GN1793@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200809111846.745826-1-christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>

On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 01:18:46PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> A possible call chain is as follow:
>   ks_wlan_start_xmit                    (ks_wlan_net.c)
>     --> hostif_data_request             (ks_hostif.c)
>       --> michael_mic                   (ks_hostif.c)
> 
> 'ks_wlan_start_xmit()' is a '.ndo_start_xmit()' function (see
> net_device_ops structure). Such calls are guarded by the __netif_tx_lock
> spinlock. So memory allocation must be atomic.
> 
> So, use GFP_ATOMIC instead of GFP_KERNEL 'in michael_mic()'
> 
> Fixes: ???
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> ---
> This is completely speculative. I don't know if the call chain given above
> if possible in RL application.
> So review carefully :)
> 
> If the fix is correct, it is also more the starting point of a bigger
> change, because in 'michael_mic()' there is a call to
> 'crypto_alloc_shash()' and this function uses GFP_KERNEL internally (in
> 'crypto_create_tfm()')
> Should this need to be changed, I don't know how 'ks_hostif.c' should be
> fixed. Changing allocation in 'crypto/api.c' looks like an overkill.
> 
> In other word, I think that my patch is wrong, but don't know what else to
> propose :).

Your patch is correct but you're also right that it's incomplete.

If you look at drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_crypt_tkip.c then they
declare the shash on stack instead of using crypto_alloc_shash().
	SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK(desc, tfm_michael);

That's probably what we should do here as well.  Although I don't know
this code very well at all...  This is probably the sort of change where
it would be good to have someone test it.

regards,
dan carpenter


      reply	other threads:[~2020-08-11 10:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-09 11:18 [PATCH] staging: ks7010: Do not use GFP_KERNEL in atomic context Christophe JAILLET
2020-08-11 10:17 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200811101746.GN1793@kadam \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).