linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@mellanox.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v2 01/13] devlink: Add reload action option to devlink reload command
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 09:16:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200817091615.37e76ca3@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1597657072-3130-2-git-send-email-moshe@mellanox.com>

On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:37:40 +0300 Moshe Shemesh wrote:
> Add devlink reload action to allow the user to request a specific reload
> action. The action parameter is optional, if not specified then devlink
> driver re-init action is used (backward compatible).
> Note that when required to do firmware activation some drivers may need
> to reload the driver. On the other hand some drivers may need to reset
> the firmware to reinitialize the driver entities.

See, this is why I wanted to keep --live as a separate option. 
Normally the driver is okay to satisfy more actions than requested, 
e.g. activate FW even if only driver_reinit was requested.

fw_live_patch does not have this semantics, it explicitly requires
driver to not impact connectivity much. No "can do more resets than
requested" here. Hence the --live part would be better off as a
separate argument (at least in uAPI, the in-kernel interface we can
change later if needed).

> Reload actions supported are:
> driver_reinit: driver entities re-initialization, applying devlink-param
>                and devlink-resource values.
> fw_activate: firmware activate.
> fw_live_patch: firmware live patching.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-17 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-17  9:37 [PATCH net-next RFC v2 00/13] Add devlink reload action option Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-17  9:37 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v2 01/13] devlink: Add reload action option to devlink reload command Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-17 16:16   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2020-08-18  9:06     ` Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-18 15:37       ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-08-17 16:36   ` Jiri Pirko
2020-08-18  9:10     ` Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-19  0:10       ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-08-19 12:18         ` Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-19 12:46           ` Jiri Pirko
2020-08-19 14:23             ` Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-19 15:18               ` Jiri Pirko
2020-08-19 16:25                 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-08-19 18:55                   ` Jiri Pirko
2020-08-17  9:37 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v2 02/13] devlink: Add supported reload actions to dev get Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-17  9:37 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v2 03/13] net/mlx5: Add functions to set/query MFRL register Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-17  9:37 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v2 04/13] net/mlx5: Set cap for pci sync for fw update event Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-17  9:37 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v2 05/13] net/mlx5: Handle sync reset request event Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-17  9:37 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v2 06/13] net/mlx5: Handle sync reset now event Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-17  9:37 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v2 07/13] net/mlx5: Handle sync reset abort event Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-17  9:37 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v2 08/13] net/mlx5: Add support for devlink reload action fw activate Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-17  9:37 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v2 09/13] devlink: Add enable_remote_dev_reset generic parameter Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-17  9:37 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v2 10/13] net/mlx5: Add devlink param enable_remote_dev_reset support Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-17  9:37 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v2 11/13] net/mlx5: Add support for fw live patch event Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-17  9:37 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v2 12/13] net/mlx5: Add support for devlink reload action live patch Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-17  9:37 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v2 13/13] devlink: Add Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-reload.rst Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-17 16:39   ` Jiri Pirko
2020-08-18  9:14     ` Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-18 11:07       ` Jiri Pirko
2020-08-18 20:04         ` Moshe Shemesh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200817091615.37e76ca3@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=moshe@mellanox.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).