From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B02C433DF for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:48:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9136920674 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:48:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727831AbgHQLsl (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 07:48:41 -0400 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:40596 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726161AbgHQLsW (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 07:48:22 -0400 Received: from atomide.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6068880A3; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:48:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 14:48:47 +0300 From: Tony Lindgren To: Adam Ford Cc: Linux-OMAP , Adam Ford , "H. Nikolaus Schaller" , =?utf-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt?= Cousson , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , devicetree , Linux Kernel Mailing List , arm-soc Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: omap3: Add cpu trips and cooling map for omap34/36 families Message-ID: <20200817114847.GL2994@atomide.com> References: <20191007220540.30690-1-aford173@gmail.com> <20191007220540.30690-2-aford173@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Adam Ford [200805 13:17]: > I know this is an old thread. I am trying to revisit some of the > other issues that came about with this, but is there any way we can > get patch 2/2 applied? It might not do anything unless the bandgap > sensor is enabled, but it at least gets us one step closer for those > who choose to enable it. With 1GHz support now available, it would be > nice to have the precautions to protect the processor from running too > fast when its too hot. Sure seems OK to me. Care to resend as I no longer have it in my inbox? Regards, Tony