From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F2CC433DF for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 18:27:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E2120738 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 18:27:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="HfCIuaUT" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726897AbgHSS1D (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:27:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58906 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726817AbgHSS0x (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:26:53 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1043.google.com (mail-pj1-x1043.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1043]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7DF1C061383 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:26:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1043.google.com with SMTP id j13so1502555pjd.4 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:26:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=fvIFX0if5musGR/AuULcq2bjqGRTVsjqU+8CFLDy+hw=; b=HfCIuaUTEFVRCg2xF4Xl2CLjgnUSrDLPxH/LNGSnFxEGH64THvX9qUz3m4bt8HSp5A 5IOSlR76HwB4xah21PaZoxVCk/d5M2Fet5xlwBPpGNFA8wnWRG9OyQNkRg8KituxX3NV MTPc1JXnrxUn7fsZcRSXehWMmRr7FpBpWz7sU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=fvIFX0if5musGR/AuULcq2bjqGRTVsjqU+8CFLDy+hw=; b=O8y2KmGrPPHnSMzh4Bh3x+4hTr84DJ46lcnsDa8FzfRqjzfo/oeEa+elYwWqs5fwwz 1/2wLm0JJti05y4xfp1UFpivq/f5wsjn0dkmPHXOhcM6VDS1wvA9LAyTs7pFCbNETf/p XCGcDmw4vuVLshxqnC+7d5RX3XV2au/TRDqZJ4dfM+m6pDzD7YYODyNHCChOf0L7Yr7r c7nG1rFWTASzR9/UekBaUDoltP09bN55FoBFUE24OIsi3bX4gL/9KnNTyQ1Ei84eJ2f/ DdJK5X2034bdEpCmPl0yVKVc/kDU85csmTMbQ4hx/aDVIgXua9CiC5NkyQlRT/CuYuzP /73g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533zCv+hXABNn1dC0zjOe3oFaaU/lVk/euIfqxsSC6lQWhH4efPO 1shIgYokMzzNBKSmSrlTuwroJA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwxgsz0D4aicIwYdouVEzk6AM/3p47+iWecIKeauBam4yUoUFDdg69JVb1+UpjSN7L/1wYAnQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a58a:: with SMTP id az10mr19250739plb.329.1597861612317; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:26:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z29sm29495220pfj.182.2020.08.19.11.26.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:26:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:26:48 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Aaron Lu , Aubrey Li , Julien Desfossez , "Paul E. McKenney" , Paul Turner , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Gleixner , Tim Chen , Tim Chen , Vincent Guittot , Vineeth Pillai , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , fweisbec@gmail.com, kerrnel@google.com, Phil Auld , Valentin Schneider , Paolo Bonzini , Chen Yu , Christian Brauner Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/12] Core-sched v6+: kernel protection and hotplug fixes Message-ID: <202008191116.1A1F51186D@keescook> References: <20200815031908.1015049-1-joel@joelfernandes.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200815031908.1015049-1-joel@joelfernandes.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 11:18:56PM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote: > This series is continuation of main core-sched v6 series [1] and adds support - Is this really "RFC"? Seeing multiple authors implies this is looking to get merged. :) - Is this on top of the v6 core-sched series (or instead of)? (That series doesn't seem to be RFC any more either, IMO, if it's at v6.) If this replaces that series, isn't this v7? I don't see the v6 core-sched series in -next anywhere? - Whatever the case, please include the series version in the "[PATCH vN ...]" portion of the Subject, otherwise things like "b4" don't really know what's happening. Sorry for the drive-by comments, but I was really confused trying to understand how this fit together. :) -- Kees Cook