From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913ADC433DF for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 21:06:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FDCD207DE for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 21:06:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727118AbgHSVGT (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Aug 2020 17:06:19 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:55834 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727046AbgHSVGS (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Aug 2020 17:06:18 -0400 IronPort-SDR: KcQ6oSogylnGHzEJTJIQu2B4ps1m9HgOYNUfhLnNevyX2Kt6RXo7xyG19zeNswBgKGtWUOFz+S CzntsdbTfjjQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9718"; a="143012617" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,332,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="143012617" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Aug 2020 14:06:17 -0700 IronPort-SDR: FWr17Dun6lUnUVRUieiFkiAHoWuXzqE9QHDABZwQLIJ3rv0tQ+AjCKZ2J4wybjEYVZfmZzOwD0 Dagg/7c9HHxg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,332,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="337083065" Received: from pbooyens-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.252.52.107]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Aug 2020 14:06:14 -0700 Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 00:06:13 +0300 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Masami Hiramatsu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andi Kleen , Ard Biesheuvel , Jessica Yu , Mark Rutland , Mike Rapoport , Peter Zijlstra , Russell King , Will Deacon , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: Use module_name() macro Message-ID: <20200819210613.GD9942@linux.intel.com> References: <20200818050857.117998-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20200818234956.c616371d8766e74aef5e7bd2@kernel.org> <20200818163356.GG137138@linux.intel.com> <20200818130045.7bb13992@oasis.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200818130045.7bb13992@oasis.local.home> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 01:00:45PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 19:33:56 +0300 > Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu > > > > Great, thank you. > > > > When this might get included to a PR, or at minimum land to linux-next? > > > > Just thinking what to use as the baseline for the next version of my > > main series. > > I can apply this to my tree along with Masami's latest bootconfig > patches. This will be for linux-next. I don't usually push to > linux-next until around -rc3. Would that be too late? > > -- Steve Nope. I have piles of stuff to catch before getting to work with this (because coming back from vacation). /Jarkko