From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961C5C433DF for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 08:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1EB2080C for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 08:05:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1597910705; bh=OWWu+MjMbXHrGQztQRN2ylfscy+5B8mChqzjsAWtscU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=zGG0tcr7klCOPvwFfWKyZJtQ//xVjX6Xy4XZ/sa+glP/YR1w/bzSi8bG9G5FcWW0R 8mi6BVkmaXBEvhnQCHTp0ooLFf5mlUIM/l8C+88lmbr/cuHGA/vGsmSr8WarRbU9H0 w+zg7DeSO7MQQlUI4VkSc7+O1z7+GipyXdWTqJtk= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726749AbgHTIFD (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Aug 2020 04:05:03 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44226 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725834AbgHTIEw (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Aug 2020 04:04:52 -0400 Received: from coco.lan (ip5f5ad5a3.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [95.90.213.163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 494C22080C; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 08:04:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1597910691; bh=OWWu+MjMbXHrGQztQRN2ylfscy+5B8mChqzjsAWtscU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=h5b1/133ACDgHCMmw6/rHv5Gql/4zGLxnABbEKYeU9N378GO55Fy4cGxpFyfiCyTc WwVI3HJOWwe4FuMDjQEAsUTVpHVI5X8qscPaThxTdaYlForCPtCHOG8P/p6r+Lu+8p CMIQRH9B5IFg3ngYjdu3Dyp2r35gyzgNbeRNFh+w= Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 10:04:40 +0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: John Stultz Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linuxarm@huawei.com, mauro.chehab@huawei.com, Manivannan Sadhasivam , Daniel Vetter , dri-devel , Bogdan Togorean , Liwei Cai , linux-arm-kernel , Daniel Borkmann , Rob Herring , "David S. Miller" , Xinliang Liu , Neil Armstrong , Wanchun Zheng , driverdevel , BPF Mailing List , Xiubin Zhang , linux-media , Tomi Valkeinen , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Laurent Pinchart , Xinwei Kong , Alexei Starovoitov , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Rob Clark , Laurentiu Palcu , Andrzej Hajda , John Fastabend , Liuyao An , "moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" , Wei Xu , Rongrong Zou , Philipp Zabel , Sam Ravnborg , Network Development , Sumit Semwal , lkml , Jakub Kicinski , David Airlie , Chen Feng Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/49] DRM driver for Hikey 970 Message-ID: <20200820100440.2d30dc02@coco.lan> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:36:52 -0700 John Stultz escreveu: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 4:46 AM Mauro Carvalho Chehab > wrote: > > So, IMO, the best is to keep it on staging for a while, until those > > remaining bugs gets solved. > > > > I added this series, together with the regulator driver and > > a few other patches (including a hack to fix a Kernel 5.8 > > regression at WiFi ) at: > > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mchehab_kernel/hikey-970/-/commi= ts/master =20 >=20 > Sorry, one more small request: Could you create a branch that only has > the DRM driver changes in it? >=20 > The reason I ask, is that since the HiKey960 isn't affected by the > majority of the problems you listed as motivation for going through > staging. So if we can validate that your tree works fine on HiKey960, > the series can be cleaned up and submitted properly upstream to enable > that SoC, and the outstanding 970 issues can be worked out afterwards > against mainline. Well, if support for HiKey 960 is OK, I guess what we can do is to not=20 push the patch with DT bindings for hikey970. We should probably fix the color swap thing at the driver first. =46rom my side, provided that the history is preserved, I don't mind if this is merged: - via staging tree; - at dri-devel tree; - or having a the historic patchsets merged at /staging, with a follow up patch moving it from staging/ into /gpu/drm/. Thanks, Mauro