From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1744C433E1 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 09:57:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918A720732 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 09:57:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1598003879; bh=dWI2a7PDA/idr+i5N+8t74lwOiD4O7oGsjPEewaLymI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=Xr2j7CLRR+6n0GMd7FCtMzRH9FPvtY48EbBnvxa0g/uGEzOgRceNNVysttx/av6pJ oiKIrWFjowV/X6E5DqU9SFIqd4RHrHaWAVKLXCK7e1TRwDXa9q6EQJF2F8iQiPoJLw Os2H6mhuOlHYlmsWLf+1nGxX75rinMS2rSMztZmE= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728369AbgHUJ56 (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Aug 2020 05:57:58 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45188 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725855AbgHUJ56 (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Aug 2020 05:57:58 -0400 Received: from localhost (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3B4420732; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 09:57:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1598003877; bh=dWI2a7PDA/idr+i5N+8t74lwOiD4O7oGsjPEewaLymI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=TTbP/CiZ3LtTB+OzxEptC2eHtTbOfsJ2FjyIQsq2/Gvn9i8ZQ7LizcL2YDst7kYsA JtpBz6dBPRziVhbXXdzJpTG3lRWuoNFZNARyGTuhaZYN9I2l0GNpxVk5XiQDSh9kBA 98bvlftlZHiOTVi2iQw03awiCSQq97qHeR167EcI= Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:57:24 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Jisheng Zhang Cc: Liam Girdwood , Rob Herring , Saravanan Sekar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] regulator: mp886x: implement set_ramp_delay Message-ID: <20200821095724.GA4870@sirena.org.uk> References: <20200820171020.5df4683b@xhacker.debian> <20200820171051.55a238e8@xhacker.debian> <20200820210513.GA41191@sirena.org.uk> <20200821101729.76f1951b@xhacker.debian> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200821101729.76f1951b@xhacker.debian> X-Cookie: divorce, n: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 10:17:29AM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > I found the reason, the three patches in v2 were applied to for-next tree. > Should I renew patches based on for-next? Since the "mps,switch-frequency" > binding isn't released and used, I think I can send new patches to convert > mps,switch-frequency to mps,switch-frequency-hz. Yes, please - for-next is best for anything that isn't a bug fix. --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl8/moMACgkQJNaLcl1U h9DOLQf+JY4OH5CtLLpCMhjPhpz6MwFD8HLR9eEjxgKO5k5ThcKPyekM/nMPmXkB pw9TaIAB5WX1su+yUtIgCyDANcpwG/ST2zLsVcZK0EXyP3cxuR4xSy7iky6dBcPk cIPTZMiGMSAOqZMrq8TxEv+emszCbp2hlzQaV5/YQJjtBlSwAQONcI7yi4WXBkQt G8d1egfMLBeKKFgy+rI7XyuHQsPTj0LZno/Eouk0U8pVNTtb1G/g/3NTA7bSjkJK awwGEnzWJm+ltjV/0MkZv91A530UIiMTGGN4A7832fywr5rr+pBez2VnblWwoasT P80pu+wGRpyIt0yhG/1Yl0ifB5GQtQ== =dKT8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+--