linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Xu Wang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugetlb_cgroup: convert comma to semicolon
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 16:54:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200823155453.GB17456@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200823152130.GA17456@casper.infradead.org>

On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 04:21:30PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 10:14:11AM +0200, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
> > >> -	cft->file_offset = offsetof(struct hugetlb_cgroup, events_file[idx]),
> > >> +	cft->file_offset = offsetof(struct hugetlb_cgroup, events_file[idx]);
> > >>  	cft->flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT;
> > 
> > I think in this case having two expressions as part of the same
> > statement is equivalent to having two separate statements.  Both
> > cft->file_offset and cft->flags get the expected value.
> 
> That's not how the comma operator works.
> 
> It will evaluate offsetof(struct hugetlb_cgroup, events_file[idx]) and
> then discard the result.  Since it has no side-effects, this is effectively
> doing:
> 
> 	cft->file_offset = cft->flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT;

_oh_.  I tested this.  I'm wrong because the comma operator is at lower
precedence than assignment.

Testcase:

struct a {
  int x;
  int y;
};

void g(struct a *a) {
  a->x = 1,
  a->y = 0;
}

void h(struct a *a) {
  a->x = (1,
  a->y = 0);
}

test.c: In function ‘h’:
test.c:12:12: warning: left-hand operand of comma expression has no effect [-Wunused-value]
   12 |   a->x = (1,
      |            ^

0000000000000000 <g>:
   0:	48 c7 07 01 00 00 00 	movq   $0x1,(%rdi)
   7:	c3                   	retq   
   8:	0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 	nopl   0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
   f:	00 

0000000000000010 <h>:
  10:	48 c7 07 00 00 00 00 	movq   $0x0,(%rdi)
  17:	c3                   	retq   

So there's no bug here!  It's just confusing, so should be fixed.

(I think Andrew was confused too ;-)

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-23 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-18  6:43 [PATCH] hugetlb_cgroup: convert comma to semicolon Xu Wang
2020-08-19  1:40 ` Andrew Morton
2020-08-19  8:14   ` Giuseppe Scrivano
2020-08-23 15:21     ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-08-23 15:54       ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2020-08-23 16:04       ` Joe Perches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200823155453.GB17456@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gscrivan@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vulab@iscas.ac.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).