From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91463C433E7 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E31B20936 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:36:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1598632612; bh=S3K11L2Ws9RoFoiHF2dBKgkGk5nN5svUjIexK0Dyb/I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=yRX00BQeMtjH0kuwF4YnNmzfy+WrulKU5TtXHZ+KNluz2VVrpqMH1gMKsVjbU23W0 gaOLAFfd+WSqe2S1g//UL51E60NVxrnNiitgDveoLUjgcwtY6631EXpEWMSs74XGI2 7GdbCAcA3Uga9bUQic8lrl2dpzP1iC4LEn1Y+dpQ= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727784AbgH1Qgv (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Aug 2020 12:36:51 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:40298 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726524AbgH1Qgv (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Aug 2020 12:36:51 -0400 Received: from localhost (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7039320872; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:36:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1598632610; bh=S3K11L2Ws9RoFoiHF2dBKgkGk5nN5svUjIexK0Dyb/I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=NfnNo6sj6MMVNZRgJ/BiW190PvetzDwBcw+02YugifzNxy+vfuSxKxHih7iPtvNBM B18v+mmC0zTzlM46vXttCFXexfGOB2KY2GPxlHNj/lvwBgddFcO3XzplJXiSgeL13B VSAcpfRA84OYwmbLZPAo1+fZiH5PM+I5itV11nYc= Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 12:36:49 -0400 From: Sasha Levin To: Qais Yousef Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Mel Gorman , Dietmar Eggemann Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Backport uclamp static key to 5.4.y stable Message-ID: <20200828163649.GT8670@sasha-vm> References: <20200828125610.30943-1-qais.yousef@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200828125610.30943-1-qais.yousef@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 01:56:08PM +0100, Qais Yousef wrote: >Hi Greg/Sasha > >The following 2 patches are backports of > > 46609ce22703: ("sched/uclamp: Protect uclamp fast path code with static key") > e65855a52b47: ("sched/uclamp: Fix a deadlock when enabling uclamp static key") > >into 5.4.y stable tree. The conflict was trivial and due to: > > 1. uclamp_rq_util_with() was renamed from util_util_with() > 2. 2 local variables were converted to unsigned long from unsigned int. > >I did do compile test on aarch64 and x86_64 and both looked fine. Beside I ran >a quick and short mmtest to verify the functionality and got the following >results which is inline with what's expected. I've queued it up, thanks! -- Thanks, Sasha