linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: paulmck@kernel.org
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
	mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/13] rcu: IPI all CPUs at GP start for strict GPs
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:11:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200831181120.1044-8-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200831181101.GA950@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>

Currently, each CPU discovers the beginning of a given grace period
on its own time, which is again good for efficiency but bad for fast
grace periods.  This commit therefore uses on_each_cpu() to IPI each
CPU after grace-period initialization in order to inform each CPU of
the new grace period in a timely manner, but only in kernels build with
CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD=y.

Reported-by Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 36a860c..88f4fa6 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1696,6 +1696,15 @@ static void rcu_gp_torture_wait(void)
 }
 
 /*
+ * Handler for on_each_cpu() to invoke the target CPU's RCU core
+ * processing.
+ */
+static void rcu_strict_gp_boundary(void *unused)
+{
+	invoke_rcu_core();
+}
+
+/*
  * Initialize a new grace period.  Return false if no grace period required.
  */
 static bool rcu_gp_init(void)
@@ -1823,6 +1832,10 @@ static bool rcu_gp_init(void)
 		WRITE_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_activity, jiffies);
 	}
 
+	// If strict, make all CPUs aware of new grace period.
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD))
+		on_each_cpu(rcu_strict_gp_boundary, NULL, 0);
+
 	return true;
 }
 
-- 
2.9.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-31 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-31 18:11 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/13] Add strict grace periods for KASAN use for v5.10 Paul E. McKenney
2020-08-31 18:11 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/13] rcu: Add Kconfig option for strict RCU grace periods paulmck
2020-08-31 18:11 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/13] rcu: Reduce leaf fanout " paulmck
2020-08-31 18:11 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/13] rcu: Restrict default jiffies_till_first_fqs for strict RCU GPs paulmck
2020-08-31 18:11 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/13] rcu: Force DEFAULT_RCU_BLIMIT to 1000 " paulmck
2020-08-31 18:11 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/13] rcu: Always set .need_qs from __rcu_read_lock() for strict GPs paulmck
2020-09-04  4:05   ` Boqun Feng
2020-09-04 13:41     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-07  0:11       ` Boqun Feng
2020-09-07  2:33         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-08-31 18:11 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/13] rcu: Do full report for .need_qs " paulmck
2020-08-31 18:11 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/13] rcu: Attempt QS when CPU discovers GP " paulmck
2020-08-31 18:11 ` paulmck [this message]
2020-08-31 18:11 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/13] rcu: IPI all CPUs at GP end " paulmck
2020-08-31 18:11 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/13] rcu: Provide optional RCU-reader exit delay " paulmck
2020-08-31 18:11 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/13] rcu: Execute RCU reader shortly after rcu_core " paulmck
2020-08-31 18:11 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/13] rcu: Report QS for outermost PREEMPT=n rcu_read_unlock() " paulmck
2020-08-31 18:11 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/13] rcu: Remove unused "cpu" parameter from rcu_report_qs_rdp() paulmck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200831181120.1044-8-paulmck@kernel.org \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).