linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: peterz@infradead.org
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/x86: add kcpuid tool to show raw CPU features
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 18:45:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200902164538.GN1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1598514543-90152-1-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com>

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 03:49:03PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> End users frequently want to know what features their processor
> supports, independent of what the kernel supports.
> 
> /proc/cpuinfo is great. It is omnipresent and since it is provided by
> the kernel it is always as up to date as the kernel. But, it can be
> ambiguous about processor features which can be disabled by the kernel
> at boot-time or compile-time.

Let me once again suggest we use CPUID faulting to 'fix' this.

We really should clear the CPUID bits when the kernel explicitly
disables things.

https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1552431636-31511-18-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-02 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-27  7:49 [RFC PATCH] tools/x86: add kcpuid tool to show raw CPU features Feng Tang
2020-09-02 15:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-09-02 16:25   ` Dave Hansen
2020-09-02 16:52     ` Borislav Petkov
2020-09-02 17:18       ` Dave Hansen
2020-09-02 18:19         ` Borislav Petkov
2020-09-03  7:17   ` Feng Tang
2020-09-02 16:45 ` peterz [this message]
2020-09-02 16:52   ` Dave Hansen
2020-09-02 16:59     ` peterz
2020-09-02 16:55   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-09-02 17:01     ` peterz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-07-21  2:00 Feng Tang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200902164538.GN1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).